04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF <strong>THE</strong> STATE 595<br />

itself a moral end. 1 It is a concrete expression of the<br />

highest th<strong>at</strong> we know, and in so far as the individual's<br />

spirit is absorbed in its service, he is living according to<br />

the highest th<strong>at</strong> he knows. The part which the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

plays in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the good life is, therefore, twofold:<br />

(i) it removes hindrances to the good life: (ii) the purpose<br />

for which it does so, the living of the good life, is a purpose<br />

which can be realized only in and through it. "The St<strong>at</strong>e,<br />

as such/' writes Bosanquet, is "limited to the office of<br />

maintaining the external conditions of a good life; but<br />

the conditions cannot be conceived without reference to<br />

the life for which they exist, and it is true, therefore, to<br />

say th<strong>at</strong> the conception of the N<strong>at</strong>ion-St<strong>at</strong>e involves <strong>at</strong><br />

least an outline of the life to which, as a power, it is<br />

instrumental/' The corollary is th<strong>at</strong> in obeying the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

we are realizing the highest conception of the good life<br />

ofwhich we are capable. Thus in service we enjoy a freedom<br />

which, apart from the St<strong>at</strong>e, would be impossible of<br />

<strong>at</strong>tainment. In order to develop this conception, let us<br />

return for a moment to the Hegelian notion of Social<br />

Righteousness. Social Righteousness is, it will be remembered,<br />

a. double-sided conception. Its subjective aspect<br />

is the individual's moral will; its objective, the laws<br />

and institutions of society. Freedom, according to Kant,<br />

consisted in obedience to the moral will; but the moral<br />

will, Hegel had asserted, is bare and meaningless apart<br />

from the individual's rel<strong>at</strong>ions to his fellows in and through<br />

which <strong>at</strong>one it finds expression. Now the individual's<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ion to his fellows, his <strong>at</strong>titude to the community of<br />

which he is a member, the conventions which regul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

these rel<strong>at</strong>ions and this <strong>at</strong>titude, and the public opinion<br />

which approves and disapproves his conduct and his<br />

person all these constitute the stuffof Social Righteousness.<br />

True freedom, according to Hegel, consists in living<br />

in accordance with the dict<strong>at</strong>es of Social Righteousness.<br />

But Social is a<br />

Righteousness conception which entails<br />

the St<strong>at</strong>e, the laws and institutions of the St<strong>at</strong>e being in<br />

1 Sec Section II (5) pp. 59* 593 **>vc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!