04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICS<br />

170<br />

ofmy st<strong>at</strong>ement, "I have the toothache", would be largely<br />

unintelligibly for there would be no bell, so to speak, in<br />

your consciousness upon which my words would strike<br />

and awaken answering echoes of symp<strong>at</strong>hetic experience.<br />

For our st<strong>at</strong>ements to one another are only intelligible to<br />

the extent th<strong>at</strong> they are based upon a fund of experience<br />

common to the person making the st<strong>at</strong>ement and to the<br />

person to whom die st<strong>at</strong>ement is made, and in this case<br />

which I am now imagining, the case in which the pain of<br />

the toothache which I am experiencing refers to something<br />

which is outside the range ofyour experience, the st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

"I have the toothache" would be unintelligible to you. It<br />

would be unintelligible, not because you failed to understand<br />

the meaning of the words I was using, but because you had<br />

never had an experience and consequently, therefore, had<br />

no memory of an experience, which would enable you to<br />

realize imagin<strong>at</strong>ively wh<strong>at</strong> kind of sens<strong>at</strong>ions I was having.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> There Cannot be a Science of Ethics. Now<br />

moral judgments would, it is said by the ethical positivists,<br />

be similarly meaningless, were it not th<strong>at</strong> the person to<br />

whom they are addressed had himself particip<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

moral experience. In fact, however, all human beings,<br />

just because they are human, do possess a moral sense<br />

and do, therefore, have moral experience. They are all,<br />

to take a particular case, sensible of the difference between<br />

the st<strong>at</strong>ements "I ought<br />

to do this" .and "I would like<br />

to do this 9<br />

', or "it would be expedient for me to do this".<br />

If they were not sensible of this difference, they would not<br />

be fully human, just as a man lacking a r<strong>at</strong>ional intelligence<br />

would not he fully human.<br />

Therefore, it is argued, moral judgments do mean some*<br />

thing to us, because they are based upon experiences which<br />

are common to all mankind. These experiences are, how- -<br />

ever, unique; there is, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, no feeling which is<br />

in any way comparable to our feeling of "oughtness",<br />

just as there is no feeling which is in any way comparable<br />

to our feeling of toothache. And, because they are unique,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!