04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354<br />

ETHICS<br />

Hobbes's Attitude to Human N<strong>at</strong>ure. So far as the<br />

individual is concerned, the most important conclusion<br />

derived by Hobbes from his egoistic psychology is a com*<br />

plctcly subjcctivist theory of good. Good, he holds, is<br />

wh<strong>at</strong>ever conduces to the individual's advantage. This<br />

type of theory has a certain affinity with wh<strong>at</strong> in a previous<br />

connection I have called the scientific view of human<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure, 1 th<strong>at</strong> is to say, the view of human n<strong>at</strong>ure which<br />

interprets its present condition in terms of its origins.<br />

Hobbes, as we shall see l<strong>at</strong>er, makes a distinction between<br />

man in the st<strong>at</strong>e of n<strong>at</strong>ure and man in society. Wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

called morality is, he holds with Glaucon* in, Pl<strong>at</strong>o's<br />

Republic, a cre<strong>at</strong>ion of society. Granted, therefore, th<strong>at</strong><br />

there was a pre-social condition of man, it will follow<br />

th<strong>at</strong> pre-social man or, as Hobbes calls him "n<strong>at</strong>ural"<br />

man, will be non-moral, and the correct method for the<br />

approach and understanding of man will be the sort of<br />

method which we should adopt with any other kind of<br />

animal. Wh<strong>at</strong>, we shall have to ask, is his n<strong>at</strong>ural dis-<br />

position, wh<strong>at</strong> sort of faculties has he, wh<strong>at</strong> is the mode of<br />

behaviour appropri<strong>at</strong>e to him, by wh<strong>at</strong> sort of motives<br />

will the actions of a cre<strong>at</strong>ure possessing such and such a<br />

disposition and such and such faculties be prompted?<br />

We are asked, then, to adopt a standpoint for our enquiry<br />

into human n<strong>at</strong>ure, from which man is regarded as a<br />

cre<strong>at</strong>ure sprung from certain origins and endowed, as a<br />

result, with certain propensities, psychological and physiological,<br />

which determine his reactions to the environment in<br />

which he is placed. If, then, we can discover the n<strong>at</strong>ure of<br />

man's propensities, if we can determine the character of<br />

man's environment, we shall understand those reactions<br />

of the propensities to the environment which constitute<br />

human behaviour. In searching for the origin of those<br />

propensities which are our mqral notions, it is upon<br />

physiology th<strong>at</strong> Hobbes chiefly relies. Looking to man's<br />

primitive equipment of appetite and desire, he concludes<br />

th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong>ever s<strong>at</strong>isfies appetite, wh<strong>at</strong>ever <strong>at</strong>tracts desire,<br />

1 Sec Chapter VII, pp. 231-241. 'See Chapter I, p. *i.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!