04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

358<br />

' ETHICS<br />

completely my individual self, is pleasant Wh<strong>at</strong>ever<br />

thwarts this endeavour is painful. Thus wh<strong>at</strong> I call<br />

good is identified with th<strong>at</strong> which gives me pleasure.<br />

Spinoza's Ethical Conclusions and Account of Origins of<br />

Moral Ideas. Though its principles are no less egoistic,<br />

Spinoza's system of ethics is altogether more dynamic than<br />

th<strong>at</strong> of Hobbcs. While, for Hobbes, the good is th<strong>at</strong> which<br />

tends to iny preserv<strong>at</strong>ion and the object of my endeavour<br />

is to remain wh<strong>at</strong> I am, for Spinoza the good is wh<strong>at</strong>ever<br />

tends to the enhancement of my individuality,<br />

and the<br />

object of my endeavour is to achieve gre<strong>at</strong>er abundance<br />

and distinctivencss of being. Spinoza, like Hobbes, thinks<br />

of the individual's welfare very largely in physiological<br />

terms. The first endeavour of the mind is, he holds, to<br />

affirm the existence of the body, and it is in die enrichment<br />

of bodily life by the s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of the body's needs, by<br />

the development of the body's capacities and by the<br />

enhancement of its powers of action, th<strong>at</strong> the good for the<br />

individual consists.<br />

Spinoza's practical conclusions are the reverse of ascetic.<br />

It is, indeed, difficult to see how any subjectivist system of<br />

ethics can subscribe to the admonition to mortify the<br />

flesh. If the good is th<strong>at</strong> which I enjoy, the more the<br />

enjoyment, the gre<strong>at</strong>er, it is obvious, the good. The<br />

practical bearing of almost all subjectivist systems of ethics<br />

has, therefore, been Epicurean and Spinoza's is no exception.<br />

E<strong>at</strong>ing, drinking, the pleasures of the senses, the<br />

beauty of n<strong>at</strong>ure, sport,<br />

art and the drama all these are<br />

prescribed to keep the body in good condition, so th<strong>at</strong> it<br />

may be in a position to perform wh<strong>at</strong>ever functions are<br />

appropri<strong>at</strong>e to its n<strong>at</strong>ure. Such, for Spinoza! is the outline<br />

of the "good "life.<br />

The word "good" is, however, rightly printed in<br />

quot<strong>at</strong>ion marks, for strictly speaking Spinoza recognizes<br />

no good* The universe as a whole is for him neither good<br />

nor bad; it just is. Good, then, can have meaning only<br />

in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to those finite individuals who are the partial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!