04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM 315<br />

the most unfortun<strong>at</strong>e consequences. As I pointed out in<br />

the last chapter, a plausible case may be made for the<br />

view th<strong>at</strong> most of the harm which is done in the world<br />

is the result of the actions of well-meaning but ill-judging<br />

people. I cited the case of war as an example. Now it may<br />

reasonably be urged th<strong>at</strong> there must be something wrong<br />

with a theory which requires us to regard as right, actions<br />

which produce such terrible consequences as those involved<br />

in the declar<strong>at</strong>ion and waging of a war, merely because<br />

the motives which lead people to fight in wars are such<br />

as we can respect.<br />

It might be and has been urged in reply th<strong>at</strong> we can<br />

and should divide wh<strong>at</strong> purports <strong>at</strong> first sight to be a<br />

single moral judgment into two separ<strong>at</strong>e judgments; th<strong>at</strong><br />

we can and should pass one judgment on motive and<br />

another on the action which proceeds from the motive.<br />

On this basis, we should be entitled to pass a favourable<br />

judgment on the motive of the enthusiastic volunteer who<br />

goes to war to fight for right and freedom, but an unfavourable<br />

one on the resultant killing and maiming for<br />

which his action is responsible. But this expedient, plausible<br />

as it appears, will not do. For, as I pointed out in the<br />

last 1<br />

chapter, the view th<strong>at</strong> we can in this way limit the<br />

scope of our ethical judgments is not one th<strong>at</strong> can be<br />

sustained. If, as I hope to have shown, we cannot judge<br />

about actions in themselves, we cannot judge about motives<br />

in themselves, and, it may be, we cannot even judge<br />

about consequences in themselves. Th<strong>at</strong> which in fact<br />

constitutes the object of our moral judgments, is, I have<br />

suggested, 8 a whole situ<strong>at</strong>ion of which motive, acts and<br />

consequences are all integral parts.<br />

Difficulties of the "Actual Consequences" Form of<br />

Utilitarianism. The view th<strong>at</strong> the lightness of an act<br />

which has been on<br />

depends upon its actual consequences,<br />

the whole the utilitarian<br />

predominant view, also leads to<br />

anomalous results: two may be mentioned. First, if this<br />

fSce Chapter VIII, pp. a8$-agi. *See Chapter VIII, pp. 291, 094.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!