04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*3*<br />

ETHICS<br />

upon die free will problem k very different Now the effect<br />

of the form of detenninism <strong>at</strong> present being considered is<br />

to represent human acts of will as determined by the<br />

characters and temperaments of the human beings whose<br />

acts they are. Our willing* are, on this view, the n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

products of our inherited psychological and physiological<br />

constitutions* -<br />

Let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> on a particular occasion I judge<br />

th<strong>at</strong> so-and-so is the right thing to do. The view which we<br />

are considering asserts th<strong>at</strong> my judgment is the necessary<br />

consequence of earlier acts and events th<strong>at</strong> have made me<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> I am. It is not the workings of a cosmic machine<br />

by which, on this view, I am bound; I am fettered by the<br />

influence of die past, nor is the constriction of my fetters<br />

the less absolute because the past is my own.<br />

The arguments for this view are not essentially different<br />

from those which 1 briefly surveyed in the last chapter to<br />

illustr<strong>at</strong>e Kant's tre<strong>at</strong>ment of man from the point of view<br />

ofthe special sciences. 1 But there is this important difference<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, whereas Kant exempted the moral will from the scope<br />

of die oper<strong>at</strong>ion of these arguments, they are for the<br />

detenninist all-embracing.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> Human N<strong>at</strong>ure is Biologically and Anthropologically<br />

Determined* Think of man, says the detenninist,<br />

biologically: you will see him as a member of a species,<br />

acting and feeling and desiring in ways appropri<strong>at</strong>e to<br />

the n<strong>at</strong>ure of th<strong>at</strong> species. Think of him again anthro-<br />

pologically: you will see him as a member of a culture,<br />

the inheritor of a tradition, the child ofan age, acknowledging<br />

the standards of valu<strong>at</strong>ion appropri<strong>at</strong>e to his culture,<br />

die codes of conduct and forms of belief enjoined by his<br />

tradition, and die world-view common to his age. Pl<strong>at</strong>o<br />

was right to point out th<strong>at</strong> the ordinary man cannot make<br />

his morals, his religion or his politics for himself; he can<br />

only take diem ready-made from his environment. Thus<br />

his views on morality or his beliefs about the n<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />

1 Sec Chapter VI, pp. 803, 904.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!