04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL RIGHTS 563<br />

present grossly inequitable basis. The followers of Marx<br />

would, then, insist th<strong>at</strong> Sovereignty in a community<br />

resides with the possessors of the instruments of production<br />

and the controllers of the sources of wealth, th<strong>at</strong> is to say,<br />

with the capitalist class. As a m<strong>at</strong>ter of historical fact,<br />

however, Marx did not develop his views in terms of a<br />

theory of Sovereignty. He pointed out simply th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e was based on force, and th<strong>at</strong> this force was used in<br />

the interests of those who held the keys of economic power.<br />

Marxist views domin<strong>at</strong>e contemporary political theory,<br />

and it is in terms of their phraseology and modes of thought,<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her than of those derived from the eighteenth-century<br />

conception of Sovereignty, th<strong>at</strong> contemporary discussion<br />

of the subject is carried on.<br />

The Contract a Logical Presupposition of Society not<br />

an Historical Occurrence. The various theories of<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ural Rights may also be criticized on the ground of<br />

abstractness. They were put forward as corollaries of the<br />

Social Contract theory of the origin of society. Th<strong>at</strong> it is<br />

exceedingly improbable th<strong>at</strong> a contract was ever made,<br />

I have already suggested. The reasons for postul<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

its occurrence are not historical but a priori. Reflecting<br />

on the structure and n<strong>at</strong>ure of society, thinkers came to the<br />

conclusion th<strong>at</strong> it must have been formed as the result of a<br />

contract. If they had said, 'we can only explain the facts<br />

of society, jf we suppose th<strong>at</strong> the n<strong>at</strong>ures of human beings<br />

are to some extent moral and social, and th<strong>at</strong> in virtue<br />

of this social morality which they possess by n<strong>at</strong>ure, they<br />

are justified in trusting one another and capable of abiding<br />

by contracts made; we must also suppose th<strong>at</strong> they have a<br />

certain social flair in virtue of which they are enabled to<br />

get on with one another in society* no exception could<br />

have been taken to their st<strong>at</strong>ement. If I were to say, *<br />

I<br />

am unable to explain the facts of the universe around me,<br />

unless I postul<strong>at</strong>e a God who cre<strong>at</strong>ed the universe',<br />

I should not consider my conclusion to have been shaken<br />

by the fact th<strong>at</strong> many primitive tribes do not believe in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!