04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l88 ETHICS<br />

owned by me, th<strong>at</strong> they i^e, in other words, my impulses,<br />

does not entitle me to draw the conclusion th<strong>at</strong> they all<br />

have for their object some change in my condition; some<br />

do and some do not It is precisely this conclusion th<strong>at</strong> is<br />

falsely drawn by Egoism.<br />

The second confasion arises from the fact th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of any of my impulses gives pleasure, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

the pleasure is my pleasure. Now this is true both of those<br />

impulses th<strong>at</strong> have for their object some change in me,<br />

and of those th<strong>at</strong> have for their object some change in<br />

other people or in things. If, for example, I am moved<br />

by the impulse of hunger or of lust, pleasure <strong>at</strong>tends the<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of my impulse and the pleasure in question<br />

is the ultim<strong>at</strong>e object of my impulse. But if I am moved<br />

by symp<strong>at</strong>hy or malice, while it is still true th<strong>at</strong> pleasure<br />

<strong>at</strong>tends the s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of the impulse th<strong>at</strong> moves me,<br />

. The<br />

the <strong>at</strong>tainment of this pleasure is not its object. The object<br />

of symp<strong>at</strong>hy is, as we have seen, the relief of another's<br />

distress, of malice the production of another's misery. It<br />

is admitted th<strong>at</strong> the s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of these impulses brings<br />

pleasure to their owner, but to say th<strong>at</strong> the enjoyment of<br />

this pleasure is his object in s<strong>at</strong>isfying the impulse is to<br />

put the cart before the horse; for the pleasure cannot, it<br />

is obvious, occur unless the impulse is s<strong>at</strong>isfied, and the<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of the impulse depends on the achievement<br />

of its object. Where impulses such as those of symp<strong>at</strong>hy<br />

and malice are concerned, the object of the impulse is<br />

ex hjpotfosi something other than and prior to the pleasure<br />

which is dependent on the achievement of the object.<br />

Fallacy of Egoism. The mistake which Egoism<br />

makes is, then, in Butler's view, to confuse the pleasure<br />

which <strong>at</strong>tends the gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion of the impulse with the<br />

object upon the <strong>at</strong>tainment of which the pleasure depends.<br />

Butler might have added th<strong>at</strong> there are many impulses,<br />

such as the impulse to sing in one's b<strong>at</strong>h, or to step out<br />

briskly on a frosty morning, or even to swear when annoyed,<br />

which, as I have already suggested, proceed from no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!