04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

, own<br />

24 ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> GREfcKS<br />

This does not mean th<strong>at</strong> they reverence morality and h<strong>at</strong>e<br />

immorality, but simply th<strong>at</strong> they prefer tlic consequences<br />

which <strong>at</strong>tend the former to those with which society has<br />

taken care to discourage the l<strong>at</strong>ter. Thus, morality is<br />

honoured not for itself, but for its rewards. Compare<br />

justice and injustice as they are in themselves, stripped,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> is to say, of their consequences; nay, more, visit the<br />

just man with the consequences which usually <strong>at</strong>tend<br />

upon injustice, and give him the reput<strong>at</strong>ion of being unjust<br />

into the bargain, and who would wish to be just?<br />

Is it, in the face of these arguments, possible to prove<br />

th<strong>at</strong> justice is intrinsically superior to injustice, th<strong>at</strong> moral-<br />

ity, in other words, is in itself better than immorality?<br />

If it is possible, say Glaucon and Adeimantus in effect, will<br />

you please, Socr<strong>at</strong>es, to prove it?<br />

A Political Answer to an Ethical Question. The<br />

case is a formidable one, and the remainder of! Pl<strong>at</strong>o's<br />

Republic either directly or by implic<strong>at</strong>ion, is devoted to<br />

answering it With the details of Socr<strong>at</strong>es's1 answer we<br />

are not <strong>at</strong> the moment concerned. Wh<strong>at</strong> concerns our<br />

present purpose is to point out th<strong>at</strong> though the question<br />

is an ethical one is morality in itself superior to immorality<br />

and, if so, why? the answer to it takes a political form.<br />

For, in order to answer it, Socr<strong>at</strong>es proceeds to the construction<br />

of an ideal St<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

Reasons for Construction of the Ideal St<strong>at</strong>e. The<br />

ostensible reason which Socr<strong>at</strong>es gives for adopting this<br />

course is th<strong>at</strong>, ifwe are in search of the principle of morality<br />

(a principle which in the Republic is called the principle of<br />

justice) in order th<strong>at</strong>, having found out wh<strong>at</strong> it really is<br />

in itself, we may be in a position to decide whether it<br />

1 Socr<strong>at</strong>es is the leading character of the Republic and, indeed, of most<br />

of Pl<strong>at</strong>o** Dialogues. There is controversy as to whether the Socr<strong>at</strong>es<br />

of the Dialogues is closely modelled on the historical personage; or<br />

is merely a dram<strong>at</strong>ic character invented as a mouthpiece for Pl<strong>at</strong>o's<br />

ideas. The weight of opinion <strong>at</strong> present inclines to the former ,<br />

view, <strong>at</strong> any rale in regard to the Socr<strong>at</strong>es of the earlier Dialogues.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!