04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM<br />

fashions of the age, of the conventions of the class, or of<br />

the needs of the society to 'which die judger happens to<br />

belong. Th<strong>at</strong> witches arc wicked and should be burned;<br />

th<strong>at</strong> capitalists are wicked and should be dispossessed;<br />

th<strong>at</strong> Germans are wicked and should be killed, are examples<br />

of such judgments passed respectively by the average<br />

citizen of the Middle Ages, by the average working-class<br />

Communist in 1937, and by the average Englishman in<br />

the years 1914-1918. These judgments would not, in<br />

Sidgwick's view, entail genuine moral intuitions about the<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure of witches, capitalists and Germans. They belong<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her to the c<strong>at</strong>egory of wh<strong>at</strong> the twentieth century calls<br />

r<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ions-r<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ions, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, of superstitious<br />

fear, class h<strong>at</strong>red and n<strong>at</strong>ional expediency. As we<br />

shall see in the next chapter, 1 it is quite possible to hold<br />

th<strong>at</strong> all ethical judgments are of this type.<br />

Are there, on Sidgwick's view, any intuitions which<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfy the conditions th<strong>at</strong> he has laid down? Are there,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> is to say, any genuine moral principles whose truth<br />

is intuitively perceived? He mentions a number of which<br />

two are important. The first is the principle th<strong>at</strong>, wh<strong>at</strong>ever<br />

good may be, the good of no one individual is of any<br />

gre<strong>at</strong>er or any less importance, than the equal good of<br />

another. The second is the principle th<strong>at</strong> it is a man's<br />

duty to aim <strong>at</strong> good generally, and not <strong>at</strong> any particular<br />

part of it, for example, <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> part of it which is his own<br />

happiness. From these two principles Sidgwick deduces<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> he calls the Principle of R<strong>at</strong>ional Benevolence,<br />

namely, th<strong>at</strong> it is no less a man's duty to try to produce<br />

st<strong>at</strong>es of mind in other individuals than it is to<br />

good<br />

produce them in himself, except in so far as he may have<br />

less power over other people's st<strong>at</strong>es of mind than he has<br />

over his own, or may feel less certain in their case than he<br />

is in his own wh<strong>at</strong> is good for them. These principles are<br />

implicit in the- writings of the utilitarians, and it is not<br />

difficult to detect the influence which, in the form of<br />

unconscious assumptions, they exert upon their theories.<br />

1 Sec Chapter X, pp. 373-382.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!