04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM 315<br />

the most unfortun<strong>at</strong>e consequences. As I pointed out in<br />

the last chapter, a plausible case may be made for the<br />

view th<strong>at</strong> most of the harm which is done in the world<br />

is the result of the actions of well-meaning but ill-judging<br />

people. I cited the case of war as an example. Now it may<br />

reasonably be urged th<strong>at</strong> there must be something wrong<br />

with a theory which requires us to regard as right, actions<br />

which produce such terrible consequences as those involved<br />

in the declar<strong>at</strong>ion and waging of a war, merely because<br />

the motives which lead people to fight in wars are such<br />

as we can respect.<br />

It might be and has been urged in reply th<strong>at</strong> we can<br />

and should divide wh<strong>at</strong> purports <strong>at</strong> first sight to be a<br />

single moral judgment into two separ<strong>at</strong>e judgments; th<strong>at</strong><br />

we can and should pass one judgment on motive and<br />

another on the action which proceeds from the motive.<br />

On this basis, we should be entitled to pass a favourable<br />

judgment on the motive of the enthusiastic volunteer who<br />

goes to war to fight for right and freedom, but an unfavourable<br />

one on the resultant killing and maiming for<br />

which his action is responsible. But this expedient, plausible<br />

as it appears, will not do. For, as I pointed out in the<br />

last<br />

1<br />

chapter, the view th<strong>at</strong> we can in this way limit the<br />

scope of our ethical judgments is not one th<strong>at</strong> can be<br />

sustained. If, as I hope to have shown, we cannot judge<br />

about actions in themselves, we cannot judge about motives<br />

in themselves, and, it may be, we cannot even judge<br />

about consequences in themselves. Th<strong>at</strong> which in fact<br />

constitutes the object of our moral judgments, is, I have<br />

suggested, 1 a whole situ<strong>at</strong>ion of which motive, acts and<br />

consequences are all integral parts.<br />

Difficulties of the "Actual Consequences" Form of<br />

Utilitarianism. The view th<strong>at</strong> the lightness of an act<br />

depends upon its actual consequences, which has been on<br />

the whole the predominant utilitarian view, also leads to<br />

anomalous results: two may be mentioned. First, if this<br />

1 See Chapter VIII, pp. 289-991, * See Chapter VIII, pp. 291, 992.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!