04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

794<br />

ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> MODERNS<br />

on rice, rusks, and vegetables; a military expert, th<strong>at</strong><br />

they should be drilled daily and sleep with gas masks<br />

hanging to their bedposts in the interests of security*<br />

Or again, though the ends of the expert may not be<br />

other than those of the community! the means th<strong>at</strong> he<br />

proposes to adopt in order to secure them may be other<br />

than those which the community wills. Most men, no<br />

doubt, desire a plenitude of goods, health and security.<br />

It does not, however, follow th<strong>at</strong> they are prepared to<br />

turn themselves into robots, vegetarians, or soldiers; and<br />

it does not follow, because they may and do acknowledge<br />

other ends with whose realiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

vegetable-e<strong>at</strong>ing and drilling conflict. Thus measures<br />

proposed by an expert, although ancillary to ends which<br />

the community desires, may nevertheless be unacceptable<br />

because their adoption conflicts with other ends which<br />

the expert does not recognize.<br />

THAT <strong>THE</strong> DISTINCTION BETWEEN ENDS AND<br />

MEANS is OFTEN INVALID. It is frequently contended<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the expert's primary concern is with means.<br />

In a democracy, it is said, the community should will<br />

the ends, the expert determine the means for their achievement.<br />

But the consider<strong>at</strong>ions just mentioned suggest th<strong>at</strong><br />

in the political sphere the distinction between means and<br />

ends may break down. For means may themselves be<br />

ends in disguise. To take a concrete example: in the spring<br />

of 1931 the Labour Government set up, <strong>at</strong> the instance<br />

of the Liberal*, a Committee the May Committee on<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ional Expenditure to advise the Government in the<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter of effecting economies. It was the Report of this<br />

Committee th<strong>at</strong> precipit<strong>at</strong>ed the financial crisis of 1931.<br />

The report recommended, among other measures, cuts<br />

in St<strong>at</strong>e expenditure on educ<strong>at</strong>ion. But to advise th<strong>at</strong><br />

this gener<strong>at</strong>ion should save its pocket by restricting the<br />

educ<strong>at</strong>ion of the next is not, as it <strong>at</strong> first sight appears to<br />

be, to recommend means to an end; it is to prefer one<br />

set of ends to another set. Now, where a conflict of ends

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!