04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>THE</strong>ORY OP GOOD OR VALUE 45!<br />

the desire to preserve the ethical virtue of the character<br />

of a deity who is conceived to be omnipotent and to have<br />

cre<strong>at</strong>ed die universe. Even, however, if we admit th<strong>at</strong> evil<br />

is unreal or is an illusion, we do not achieve the desired<br />

result. For, if evil is unreal, then error 19 real. There is<br />

no doubt th<strong>at</strong> we think th<strong>at</strong> we suffer pain and th<strong>at</strong> we<br />

think th<strong>at</strong> men do us evil. We think also th<strong>at</strong> the pain<br />

which we suffer and the evil which is done to us are real.<br />

Either this belief of ours is a mistake, or it is not. If it<br />

is not, pain and evil are real. If it is, then the error we<br />

make in thinking them to be real is a real error (if it were<br />

an unreal error, then we should not really be making a<br />

mistake in thinking pain and evil to be real, and pain and<br />

evil would be real). Therefore, the character of the deity<br />

is such as to permit us to labour under a real error which,<br />

if He chose, He could remove. Nevertheless, He does not<br />

remove it but allows us to be deceived as to die real n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

of pain and evil. But an omnipotent being has not the<br />

need, a benevolent being has not the wish to deceive.<br />

I conclude, then, th<strong>at</strong>, since the view 6f evil as being<br />

in some sense unreal does not have the desired consequence<br />

of vindic<strong>at</strong>ing the moral character of a cre<strong>at</strong>ive deity who<br />

is conceived to be omnipotent, the main incentive for<br />

holding<br />

it is removed.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> Evil Though Real is Indefinable. Wh<strong>at</strong>, then,<br />

are the arguments for the view th<strong>at</strong> evil is, like good, a<br />

real and independent principle, which is also unanalysable<br />

and indefinable?<br />

The best way to realize the unanalysable and indefinable<br />

character of evil is to consider the <strong>at</strong>tempts which<br />

have been made to define it in terms of some other char-<br />

acter or combin<strong>at</strong>ion of characters.<br />

(i) Evil might, for example, be defined as wh<strong>at</strong> one ought<br />

to try to avoid. This substitutes the indefinable "ought"<br />

for Ac indefinable "evil". But the notion of "evil" is far<br />

wider than wh<strong>at</strong> we ought to try to avoid. We can only<br />

try to avoid the things we know. But there is no reason to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!