04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8UBJECTIVIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF ETHICS 363<br />

good stand for two different things; but, he holds, there<br />

is a universal and reciprocal connection between them.<br />

Thus wh<strong>at</strong>ever we call good turns out to be pleasant or<br />

conducive to pleasure, and to wh<strong>at</strong>ever we find to be<br />

pleasant we give the name of "good."<br />

Although it is subjectivist, Hume's theory is not egoistic.<br />

Just as his assertion th<strong>at</strong> it is not the approval of the self,<br />

but the approval of all or most men th<strong>at</strong> confers lightness<br />

upon actions, and goodness upon persons and characters,<br />

constitutes a departure from the extreme subjectivist<br />

position, so by his endeavour to establish the existence<br />

and validity of altruistic sentiments he declares his repudi<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of Egoism. In this endeavour he succeeds better than<br />

any other subjectivist writer. His theory is as follows.<br />

Men, as we have seen, are so constituted th<strong>at</strong> they feel<br />

an emotion of approval for happiness and for wh<strong>at</strong>ever<br />

conduces to happiness. This emotion of approval is not<br />

confined to the happiness, or to wh<strong>at</strong> conduces to the<br />

happiness, of themselves. On the contrary, they feel it<br />

in contempl<strong>at</strong>ing happiness wherever or in whomsoever<br />

it is found. The fact th<strong>at</strong> they do so is invoked by<br />

Hume as evidence for wh<strong>at</strong> he calls "the principle of<br />

benevolence. "<br />

Hume's Establishment of the Principle of Benevolence.<br />

Now this principle is put forward as an altruistic one.<br />

Hume, in fact, goes out of his way to criticize Hobbes<br />

and Spinoza whose egoistic premises had committed them<br />

to a repudi<strong>at</strong>ion ofany principle of benevolence. In opposi-<br />

tion to their view, Hume brings forward the following<br />

arguments. We* feel an emotion of approval for actions,<br />

characters and sentiments, in liter<strong>at</strong>ure and on the stage,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> cannot possibly affect us. Nor is it to the point to<br />

say th<strong>at</strong> we imagine ourselves as contempl<strong>at</strong>ing those actions<br />

and being affected by those characters in real life, because,<br />

as Hume trulysays, mere imagin<strong>at</strong>ion could never produce<br />

the emotion by itself, if we knew th<strong>at</strong> it was only imagina-<br />

tion. Again, we feel the emotion of approval for qualities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!