04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49<br />

*<br />

POLITICS<br />

enforced. Formul<strong>at</strong>ion and interpret<strong>at</strong>ion are the task<br />

of the legisl<strong>at</strong>ure; enforcement of the executive. But while<br />

the need for formul<strong>at</strong>ion is intermittent and arises only<br />

on particular occasions, the need for enforcement is permanent<br />

Hence the* body of represent<strong>at</strong>ive legisl<strong>at</strong>ors<br />

should sit only occasionally and, since the task of formula-<br />

tion is quickly accomplished, for short periods, while the<br />

executive will be permanently in office. Locke regarded<br />

the separ<strong>at</strong>ion of die legisl<strong>at</strong>ure from the executive as one<br />

of the gre<strong>at</strong>est safeguards against tyranny. If those who<br />

make the laws are the same as those who are responsible<br />

for their enforcement, there will, he says, always be a<br />

danger th<strong>at</strong> the legisl<strong>at</strong>ors "may exempt themselves<br />

from obedience to the laws they make and suit the law,<br />

both in its making and its execution, to their own priv<strong>at</strong>e<br />

wish, and thereby come to have a distinct interest from<br />

the rest of the community, contrary to the end of society<br />

and .<br />

government<br />

Provided th<strong>at</strong> the law of n<strong>at</strong>ure is properly interpreted,<br />

provided, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, th<strong>at</strong> the government does in fact<br />

the law<br />

carry out the will of those who elect it to interpret<br />

of n<strong>at</strong>ure for them, it is the duty of the people to obey<br />

the laws and to co-oper<strong>at</strong>e in the running of the St<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

So soon, however, as a government infringes or fails to<br />

provide for the exercise of the individual's rights as prescribed<br />

by the law of n<strong>at</strong>ure, there is a right of rebellion.<br />

Rebellion, however, is only justified,<br />

if the majority<br />

desire it; or, to put the point in another way, it is only<br />

justified when the government becomes unrepresent<strong>at</strong>ive^<br />

Against a government th<strong>at</strong> represents and carries out the<br />

wishes of the majority, there is no right of rebellion. The<br />

only weapon which a minority is entitled to use is persuasion<br />

with die object of bringing the majority round to its way<br />

of thinking. From this discussion of the rights of majorities<br />

and minorities in a St<strong>at</strong>e, ethical conceptions are again<br />

rigidly excluded. The question whether the majority<br />

is right is never discussed; it is sufficient for Locke th<strong>at</strong> it<br />

is a majority.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!