04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

498<br />

POLITICS<br />

point of view, even if nobody happens to express it, and<br />

since, in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to .every emergency which may occur,<br />

there is always a right course of action, even though there<br />

may be nobody to take it, a General Will always exists<br />

in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to every issue which presents itself for decision<br />

in a community, even when nobody is actually willing it,<br />

and it is the will to adopt this view and to take this action*<br />

When nobody happens to be thinking or willing disin-<br />

terestedly, Rousseau insists th<strong>at</strong> the General Will is not,<br />

therefore, "extermin<strong>at</strong>ed or corrupted ... it is always<br />

constant, unalterable and pure; but it is subordin<strong>at</strong>ed to<br />

other wills which encroach upon its sphere".<br />

(3) Although every individual may, as we have seen,<br />

"have a priv<strong>at</strong>e will contrary to the general will he has<br />

as a citizen", he does, nevertheless, also particip<strong>at</strong>e in the<br />

General Will. Even if he does not consciously will in<br />

accordance with the General Will on a particular occasion,<br />

he nevertheless does so potentially.<br />

The General Will, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, the will to take such<br />

action as is beneficial to society as a whole and, therefore,<br />

to himself as a member of society, is, indeed, always present<br />

in him.<br />

(4) Rousseau r<strong>at</strong>her neg<strong>at</strong>ives this last suggestion by<br />

laying it down th<strong>at</strong> the General Will only manifests itself<br />

in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to m<strong>at</strong>ters of general import "the general<br />

will", to repe<strong>at</strong>, "must be general in its object as well as<br />

in its origin" in regard to which it is possible for the<br />

interests of the community to coincide. "Wh<strong>at</strong> generalizes<br />

the will," Rousseau adds, "13 less the number of votes<br />

than the common interest which unites them." He condudes<br />

th<strong>at</strong> in regard to issues on which the interests of<br />

individuals are opposed, the decision must be declined by<br />

the General Will and taken by the executive. Why, then,<br />

one wonders, should the citizen on these occasions obey<br />

the executive, linee the action of the executive is, <strong>at</strong> any<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to these issues, not embodying the General<br />

Will. Rousseau 9<br />

* answer is, because the executive is<br />

appointed by die General Will to determine contentious

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!