04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICS<br />

far as the individual is concerned, the end is precisely<br />

this st<strong>at</strong>e of equilibrium. Is it ever completely achieved?<br />

Obviously it is not. There is, then, for Spencer, no<br />

absolute standard of good. Ultim<strong>at</strong>e good is an unrealized,<br />

possibly an unrealizable, goal, just because complete<br />

equilibrium is never realized and may never be realizable.<br />

Meanwhile, however, wh<strong>at</strong>ever conduces to this end is<br />

good. Human beings being various, and the contingencies<br />

of life uxiforseeable, scientific ethics cannot lay down<br />

exact rules for guidance as to how the end is to be achieved;<br />

it can only indic<strong>at</strong>e the general direction, explain why it<br />

should be followed, and point out th<strong>at</strong>, in so far as it is<br />

followed we shall experience pleasure. In thus insisting<br />

upon the provisional n<strong>at</strong>ure ofall ethical rules and principles<br />

Spencer agrees with Aristotle.<br />

Spencer's Account of Altruism and Explan<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

Society, The scheme is, so far, a purely egoistic one.<br />

The Darwinian principle of N<strong>at</strong>ural Selection announced<br />

struggle as the law of life, and the survival of the individual<br />

as its end. But cre<strong>at</strong>ures evolved by the method of struggle,<br />

and acknowledging only the law of self-survival, cannot<br />

be credited with the desire to promote the welfare also,<br />

presumably, envisaged in terms of survival of other<br />

beings. Spencer has, therefore, to meet the difficulty<br />

which all forms of subjectivist ethics encounter of explaining<br />

the existence ofwh<strong>at</strong> are normally regarded as altruistic<br />

sentiments, and the oper<strong>at</strong>ion of wh<strong>at</strong> are apparently<br />

disinterested motives. The difficulty is met within the<br />

framework of the general evolutionary theory upon the<br />

following lines.<br />

Spencer propounded a celebr<strong>at</strong>ed formula for evolutionary<br />

progress in terms of an advance from the more<br />

simple to the more complex. Evolution, he says, is "a<br />

process whereby an indefinite, incoherent, homogeneity is<br />

transformed into a definite, coherent, heterogeneity*'.<br />

Thus the jellyfish is compar<strong>at</strong>ively structureless and homogeneous,<br />

while man is a complic<strong>at</strong>ed vertebr<strong>at</strong>e whose

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!