04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 2OI<br />

the will, for if we could only do wh<strong>at</strong> is right, morality,<br />

as we know it, would not exist. But equally it would not<br />

exist if, having done wrong, and done wrong habitually,<br />

we could not repent and reform, for the conception of<br />

moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion implies th<strong>at</strong>, if we ought to do a thing,<br />

we always can do it. This conception we must now consider<br />

in the form in which it was developed by its most forthright<br />

exponent, Immanucl Kant (1724-1804), whom<br />

many would consider to be the most important, not only<br />

of the objective-intuitionists, but of all writers upon the<br />

subject of ethics. The question of the possibility of human<br />

freedom will be discussed in the next chapter.<br />

III. KANT<br />

Metaphysical Significance of Kant's Moral Theory.<br />

Kant's moral philosophy is intim<strong>at</strong>ely bound up with<br />

his metaphysics, nor can it be adequ<strong>at</strong>ely understood<br />

apart from his theory of the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the universe as a<br />

whole. Those who wish to obtain a general understanding<br />

of this theory, will find an outline of it in Chapter XIV<br />

of my Guide to Philosophy. For the purpose of the present<br />

discussion, the reader must be content with the bald st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

th<strong>at</strong> Kant divides the universe into two parts or<br />

worlds. There is, he holds, the world of things as they are<br />

in themselves, aftd there is the world of things as they<br />

appear to us. The second world is necessarily and always<br />

different from the first, since in knowing things the human<br />

mind changes them, imposing upon them a framework<br />

of qualities and rel<strong>at</strong>ions which they do not possess in<br />

themselves. Just as a man who was born with a pair of blue<br />

spectacles permanently affixed to his nose would assert<br />

th<strong>at</strong> everything was blue, and just as the blueness would,<br />

nevertheleM, not belong to the things which he saw but<br />

would be a quality imposed upon them by the conditions<br />

under which he saw than th<strong>at</strong> he should see them to<br />

be blue would, in fact, be a condition of his seeing them<br />

<strong>at</strong> all so, Kant held, everything we know possesses<br />

Gi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!