04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARIS<strong>TO</strong>TLE'S MORALS AND POLITICS I0g<br />

a piece of m<strong>at</strong>ter* A limb moves, or a limb causes an<br />

object to move, with the result th<strong>at</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter is displaced in<br />

1<br />

space. Moreover, as I shall try to show, it is impossible,<br />

to say either where an action begins, or where it ends.<br />

may If I . here the fuller discussion which<br />

anticip<strong>at</strong>e<br />

appears on a l<strong>at</strong>er page, let us take as an example the action<br />

of forging a cheque. Does the action begin with the neural<br />

disturbance in die brain th<strong>at</strong> initi<strong>at</strong>es the movement in<br />

the motor nervous system which controls the fingers, or<br />

with the travelling of the relevant messages along the<br />

motor nervous system, or with the movements of the hand<br />

th<strong>at</strong> takes up the pen, or with the movements of the<br />

fingers th<strong>at</strong> make the sign<strong>at</strong>ure? To say th<strong>at</strong> the action<br />

begins with any one of these is, it is obvious, to introduce<br />

an arbitrary break into a continuous process. Similar<br />

difficulties arise when we try to assign an end to the action.<br />

Does the action conclude with the termin<strong>at</strong>ion of the last<br />

movement of the fingers in making the sign<strong>at</strong>ure, or with<br />

the movements entailed in blotting and taking up the<br />

cheque, or in stretching out the arm to hand the cheque<br />

over the counter? Where in fact does the action end and<br />

where do its consequtncts begin? It is no easier to answer<br />

than it is to say where it begins. Difficulties of this kind<br />

have led many philosophers to deny th<strong>at</strong> actions in themselves<br />

are ever the objects of ethical judgments, and to<br />

substitute motives, intentions, consequences,<br />

or all of these. 9<br />

Aristotle's Doctrine of the Will. Aristotle includes<br />

both motive and intention in wh<strong>at</strong> he calls "choice" or<br />

" deliber<strong>at</strong>e desire ", and we call will. It is the condition<br />

of the will revealed by men's acts which, in his view, is<br />

the true object of ethical judgment. The will as con-<br />

ceived by him comprises two elements, one intellectual,<br />

the other appetitive. The appetitive element is our desire<br />

for a particular result; the intellectual element calcul<strong>at</strong>es<br />

1 For a fuller diictmion of the object of our ethical judgments tee<br />

Chapter VIII, pp. 287-295-<br />

See Chapter VIII, pp. 287-295-<br />

'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!