04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARIS<strong>TO</strong>TLE'S MORALS AND POLITICS 113<br />

Aristotle's theory reduces itself. Aristotte tries to escape<br />

its implic<strong>at</strong>ions by insisting th<strong>at</strong> "a man is somehow<br />

responsible for his moral st<strong>at</strong>e; he is somehow responsible<br />

for wh<strong>at</strong> appears good to him". If he is not, then, Aristotle<br />

agrees, "virtue is no more voluntary than vice, each man's<br />

end being determined for him, not by choice but by<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure or in some other way".<br />

But this does not really help m<strong>at</strong>ters, for we want<br />

to know in wh<strong>at</strong> sense a man is "responsible for his moral<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e", since his moral st<strong>at</strong>e is formed by<br />

his actions.<br />

Modem Version of Self-Determinism. Self-Determinism<br />

is a theory widely held <strong>at</strong> the present time. It<br />

has been developed by modern psychologists and is the<br />

basis, usually unavowed, of the conception of human<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure invoked by psycho-analysis. So developed, it<br />

perhaps<br />

the most formidable body of argument th<strong>at</strong> those who<br />

constitutes, as I shall try in a l<strong>at</strong>er chapter to show, l<br />

believe in free will have to face, and it is worth while<br />

pausing for a moment to consider wh<strong>at</strong> precisely in its<br />

modern form it asserts, and wh<strong>at</strong> are the grounds on<br />

which it bases its assertions. Let us take as typical of this<br />

school of thought the views of Freud.<br />

Freud holds th<strong>at</strong> the origin and explan<strong>at</strong>ion of all<br />

oonscious events is to be found in the unconscious. Our<br />

conscious thoughts and desires are, therefore, the reflections<br />

more or less distorted and more or leqs sublim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

of unconscious elements in our n<strong>at</strong>ure. We do not know<br />

if we did it would not<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> is going on in the .unconscious;<br />

be unconscious, but, in respect of our knowledge of it,<br />

conscious;<br />

therefore we cannot control it.<br />

If we do not know it and cannot control it, we are not<br />

responsible for it; therefore we are not responsible for the<br />

particular version of it th<strong>at</strong> appears in consciousness. In<br />

other words, we are not responsible for our thoughts and<br />

desires. Our thoughts determine wh<strong>at</strong> we think, our<br />

desires wh<strong>at</strong> we do. If, in short, consciousness is rightly<br />

1 See Chapter VII, pp. 237-244.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!