04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 ETHICS AND POLITICS,* <strong>THE</strong> GREEKS<br />

Or consider the virtue of temperance, which is discussed<br />

in the Dialogue known as the Chartnides. Temperance<br />

consists neither in the indulgence of every side of our<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure nor in the repression of every side* On the contrary,<br />

true temperance implies th<strong>at</strong> some rule of conduct has<br />

been adopted according to which every part<br />

of our n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

is permitted as much indulgence as is good for it, and<br />

will not interfere with the development of the rest. Who<br />

or wh<strong>at</strong> is it th<strong>at</strong> lays down this rule? Clearly it is reason.<br />

Temperance, then, is a form of self-knowledge. It depends<br />

upon, or consists in, a recognition by reason of how much<br />

scope should be given to the various appetites and passions;<br />

it depends upon our knowing which parts of our n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

should be in subjection to which* The intemper<strong>at</strong>e man<br />

lacks this knowledge. Not only does he not know when<br />

to put a stop to the indulgence of any part of his n<strong>at</strong>ure,<br />

but he does not know the proper ordering or disposition<br />

of the different parts, and he fails to recognize th<strong>at</strong> his<br />

passions must be subject to a rule which has been laid<br />

down by his reason.<br />

Once again, then, we reach the same conclusion, th<strong>at</strong><br />

virtue is a kind of knowledge, a knowledge of "wh<strong>at</strong><br />

ought to be" "ought to be", th<strong>at</strong> is to say, because it is<br />

good , while evil is an ignorance of wh<strong>at</strong> "ought to be."<br />

Let the ignorance be removed and the compelling power<br />

ofthe newly recognized good cannot but draw the individual<br />

to pursue it. Socr<strong>at</strong>es concludes th<strong>at</strong> all the virtues are<br />

really one and the same, since each reveals itself on analysis<br />

to be a knowledge of die Good, and th<strong>at</strong>, since no man<br />

can know wh<strong>at</strong> is good without doing it, wrong-doing is<br />

always involuntary.<br />

The Defects of the Socr<strong>at</strong>ic View. The defects of this<br />

view are fairly obvious and an enumer<strong>at</strong>ion of them will<br />

introduce the more developed ethical theory of Pl<strong>at</strong>o which,<br />

in its turn leads on to the political arguments, by means<br />

of which Socr<strong>at</strong>es proceeds to answer Glaucon and Adeimantus.<br />

First, then, the Socr<strong>at</strong>ic view entails wh<strong>at</strong> is in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!