21.06.2014 Views

XXVI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas

XXVI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas

XXVI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 320 ­<br />

In Tierra <strong>de</strong>l Fuego tor the beliet that these two occurrences, as matntainecl<br />

by Koppers, have been clerived from a common point of origin in<br />

r\sia whence they \\'ere can-ied to 01' diffused to the Pacific on the ol1e<br />

hanu America via Bering Strait 011 the other, is 110t only more plausible<br />

on general principIes of early human movements but is also supported by<br />

lhe p resenee of this leehnique in Japan (O, T. Masan).<br />

Further­<br />

J1l(lre, \\e-cannot be cenain as to the antiquity of these coiled baskets in<br />

Austra lia.<br />

They see m to have been lacking in Tasmania, although U!1­<br />

supported ciaims have been ma<strong>de</strong> to the contrary, and in being confined<br />

to eastern Australia from Victoria and South Australia to Torres<br />

Strait, their sporadic di.stribution suggests that they may represent an<br />

old diffusio!l from New Guinea, but not neeessarily one of great antiquity<br />

(Davidson, 1).<br />

'fhere is some doubt, therefore, as to their age in Australia.<br />

At lea st the faels suggest that we have no right to take an antiquity<br />

of 6,000 years for g ranted.<br />

Ba,rf¿ Canoes of Se'veraJ Pieces,-Now it has been admitted by Rivet<br />

in his earlier stud ies that none of the types of watercraft found hi storieally<br />

in either Australia 01' Tierra <strong>de</strong>l Fuego eould have been employed<br />

in a transoceanic migration.<br />

He therefore was forced to suppose that<br />

some superior sca-going craft had been known to the Australlans some<br />

3,000 years ago and that for reasons unexplained they were discar<strong>de</strong>d<br />

slIbsequently, both by the Australians who remained at home and by<br />

the ,,\ustraI ians who macle the hypothetical jOllrney to South America.<br />

For these assumptions tbere is 1l0l a parttcle of evi<strong>de</strong>nce.<br />

Not only are<br />

there !lO data frOI11 either area \vhich wO llJd even hint that there ever<br />

has been present any craÚ superior to those found in historic times, but<br />

a theory of <strong>de</strong>generation, with its insinuation tbat both peoples had lost<br />

interest in the sea , is al so contrary to the available ,facts from both reglo<br />

ns. \¡Vhat tite interests of the Australians may have been some 3,000<br />

yeai's ago oi course is illlpossible to say, but the mo<strong>de</strong>rn aborigines, far<br />

trcm turnillg from lhe ~ ea,<br />

have shown a 1110st eager IJJ, erest to acquire<br />

more advanced types of watercraft ¿nd, if we may judge from the distl'ibulion<br />

of types oi wat¿rcraft in Australia (lnd the known directions<br />

of diffusion during the past eentury or more, it appears that the same<br />

conditioJJs ha ve prevailecl tal' many hund reds of years if not 'for a greater<br />

period oi time (Davidson, Il).<br />

'vVe have an abundance of information to show th e rapid cliffusion<br />

during the past century of foreign craft -three types of Melanesian<br />

olltrigger canoe in the Cape York Peninsu la, and Malay dogouts in<br />

North Australia- all of which have been recently introduced 011 the conrinell<br />

t and taken over with celerity by the Australians. The dOgOllt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!