13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1008 Chapter 17: The Cell Cycle

Figure 17–57 A bivalent with three chiasmata resulting from three

crossover events. (A) Light micrograph of a grasshopper bivalent.

(B) Drawing showing the arrangement of the crossovers in (A). Note that

chromatid 1 has undergone an exchange with chromatid 3, and chromatid

2 has undergone exchanges with chromatids 3 and 4. Note also how

the combination of the chiasmata and the tight attachment of the sister

chromatid arms to each other (mediated by cohesin complexes) holds the

two homologs together after the synaptonemal complex has disassembled;

if either the chiasmata or the sister-chromatid cohesion failed to form, the

homologs would come apart at this stage and not be segregated properly in

meiosis I. (A, courtesy of Bernard John.)

Homolog Segregation Depends on Several Unique Features of

Meiosis I

A fundamental difference between meiosis I and mitosis (and meiosis II) is that

in meiosis I homologs rather than sister chromatids separate and then segregate

(see Figure 17–53). This difference depends on three features of meiosis I that distinguish

it from mitosis (Figure 17–58).

First, both sister kinetochores in a homolog must attach stably to the same

spindle pole. This type of attachment is normally avoided during mitosis (see Figure

17–33). In meiosis I, however, the two sister kinetochores are fused into a single

microtubule-binding unit that attaches to just one pole (see Figure 17–58A).

The fusion of sister kinetochores is achieved by a complex of proteins that is

(A)

(B)

MBoC6 m21.10/17.57

4

1 2 3

(A) MEIOSIS

kinetochore

microtubules

+

cohesin

kinetochore

centromere

cohesin

haploid daughter nuclei

kinetochore

chromatid

+

METAPHASE I

ANAPHASE I

METAPHASE II

ANAPHASE II

TELOPHASE II

(B)

MITOSIS

cohesin

chromatid

diploid daughter nuclei

centromere

+

kinetochore

microtubules

kinetochore

METAPHASE

ANAPHASE

TELOPHASE

Figure 17–58 Comparison of chromosome behavior in meiosis I, meiosis II, and mitosis. Chromosomes behave similarly in mitosis and meiosis

II, but they behave very differently in meiosis I. (A) In meiosis I, the two sister kinetochores are located side-by-side on each homolog and attach to

microtubules from the same spindle pole. The proteolytic cleavage of cohesin along the sister-chromatid arms unglues the arms and resolves the

crossovers, allowing the duplicated homologs to separate at anaphase I, while the residual cohesin at the centromeres keeps the sisters together.

Cleavage of centromeric cohesin allows the sister chromatids to separate at anaphase II. (B) In mitosis, by contrast, the two sister kinetochores

attach to microtubules from different spindle poles, and the two sister chromatids come apart at the start of anaphase and segregate into separate

daughter nuclei.

MBoC6 m21.12/17.58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!