13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

934 Chapter 16: The Cytoskeleton

(A)

microtubule

MAP2

25 nm

MTs

(B)

microtubule

tau

Figure 16–51 Organization of

microtubule bundles by MAPs. (A) MAP2

binds along the microtubule lattice at one

of its ends and extends a long projecting

arm with a second microtubule-binding

domain at the other end. (B) Tau possesses

a shorter microtubule cross-linking domain.

(C) Electron micrograph showing a cross

section through a microtubule bundle in

a cell overexpressing MAP2. The regular

spacing of the microtubules (MTs) in this

bundle results from the constant length of

the projecting arms of the MAP2.

(D) Similar cross section through a

microtubule bundle in a cell overexpressing

tau. Here the microtubules are spaced

more closely together than they are in (C)

because of tau’s relatively short projecting

arm. (C and D, courtesy of J. Chen et

al., Nature 360:674–677, 1992. With

permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd.)

(C)

(D)

300 nm

rate at which a microtubule switches from a growing to a shrinking state (the frequency

of catastrophes) or from a shrinking to a growing state (the frequency of

rescues). For example, members of a family of kinesin-related proteins known as

catastrophe factors (or kinesin-13) bind to microtubule ends and appear to pry

protofilaments apart, lowering the normal activation-energy barrier that prevents

a microtubule from springing apart into the curved protofilaments that are characteristic

of the shrinking state (Figure 16–52). Another protein, called Nezha or

MBoC6 m16.41/16.51

Patronin, protects microtubule minus ends from the effects of catastrophe factors.

While very few microtubule minus-end-binding proteins have been characterized,

a large subset of MAPs has been identified that are enriched at microtubule

plus ends. A particularly ubiquitous example is XMAP215, which has close

homologs in organisms that range from yeast to humans. XMAP215 binds free

tubulin subunits and delivers them to the plus end, thereby promoting microtubule

polymerization and simultaneously counteracting catastrophe factor activity

(see Figure 16–52). The phosphorylation of XMAP215 during mitosis inhibits

catastrophe factor

(kinesin-13)

GTP cap

on plus end

of microtubule

DESTABILIZATION

STABILIZATION

XMAP215

frequency of

catastrophes

increased

frequency of catastrophes

suppressed and growth

rate enhanced

Figure 16–52 The effects of proteins

that bind to microtubule ends. The

transition between microtubule growth

and shrinkage is controlled in cells by a

variety of proteins. Catastrophe factors

such as kinesin-13, a member of the

kinesin motor protein superfamily, bind

to microtubule ends and pry them apart,

thereby promoting depolymerization. On

the other hand, a MAP such as XMAP215

stabilizes the end of a growing microtubule

(XMAP stands for Xenopus microtubuleassociated

protein, and the number refers

to its molecular mass in kilodaltons).

XMAP215 binds tubulin dimers and delivers

them to the microtubule plus end, thereby

increasing the microtubule growth rate and

suppressing catastrophes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!