13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF CELL FUNCTIONS

515

bound fraction

(B)

1.0

0.5

0

(A)

bound fraction =

TRANSCRIPTION

ACTIVATOR

K[R]

1 + K[R]

unbound fraction = 1 – bound fraction =

unbound fraction

0.5

0

1/K A concentration of protein A (C) 1/K R

protein production rate = β. m

1

1 + K[R]

1

1

1 + K[R]

TRANSCRIPTION

REPRESSOR

concentration of protein R

Figure 8–75 How promoter occupancy

depends on the binding affinity of a

transcription regulator protein. (A) The

fraction of a binding site that is occupied by

a transcription repressor R is determined

by an equation that is similar to the one

we used for a transcription activator (see

Figure 8–72E), except that in the case of a

repressor we are interested primarily in the

unbound fraction. (B) For a transcription

activator A, half of the promoters are

occupied when [A] = 1/K A . Gene activity is

proportional to this bound fraction. (C) For

a transcription repressor R, gene activity

is proportional to the unbound fraction

of promoters. As indicated, this fraction

is reduced to half of its maximal value

when [R]=1/K R . (D) As in the case of the

transcription activator A (see Figure 8–74),

we can derive equations to assess the

timing of protein X production as a function

of repressor concentrations.

(D)

d[X]

dt

1 [X]

= β. m –

Equation 8–7

1 + K[R] τ X

1

[X st ] = β. m .

1 + K[R]

τ X

Negative Feedback Is a Powerful Strategy in Cell Regulation

Thus far, we have considered simple regulatory systems of just a few components.

In most of the complex regulatory systems that govern cell behaviors, multiple

modules are linked to produce larger circuits that we call network motifs, which

can produce surprisingly complex and biologically useful responses whose properties

become apparent only through mathematical analysis. A particularly common

and important network motif is the negative feedback loop, which can have

dramatically different functions depending on how it is structured.

We take as a first example a network motif consisting of two linked modules

(Figure 8–76A). Here, an input signal initiates the transcription of gene A, which

produces a transcription activator protein A. This activates gene R, which synthesizes

a transcription repressor protein R. Protein R in turn binds to the promoter

of gene A to inhibit its expression. This cyclical organization creates a negative

feedback loop that one can intuitively understand as a mechanism to prevent

proteins from accumulating to high levels. But what can we learn about negative

feedback loops, and their value in biology, by using mathematics to model them?

The negative feedback loop in Figure 8–76A can be modeled using Equation

8–7 (see Figure 8–75D) for the repression of gene A and Equation 8–5 (see Figure

8–74B) for the activation of gene R. Thus, for proteins A and R, we use the set of differential

equations (Equation set 8–8) shown in Figure 8–76B. The two equations

in this set are coupled, which means that they must be solved together to describe

MBoC6 n8.604/8.79

Figure 8–76 A simple negative feedback motif. (A) Gene A negatively

regulates its own expression by activating gene R. The product of gene R is a

transcription repressor that inhibits gene A. (B) Equation set 8–8 can be solved

to determine the dynamics of system components over time. (C) A system with

negative feedback (blue) reaches its steady state faster than a system with

no feedback (red). The plots indicate the levels of protein A, expressed as a

fraction of the steady-state level. The blue line reflects the solution of Equation

set 8–8, which includes negative feedback of gene A by the repressor R. The

red line represents the solution when the rate of synthesis of A was set to a

constant value that is unaffected by the repressor R.

(A)

(B)

fraction steady-state

protein level

(C)

ACTIVATING

INPUT

1

0.5

0

GENE A

A

d[A] β A

. mA

=

dt 1 + K R [R]

GENE R

[A]

τ A

d[R]

K

= β R

. A [A] [R]

mR –

dt

1 + K A [A] τ R

Equation set 8–8

R

time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!