Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

enforced vaccination could be ‘necessary in a democratic society’.
The 17 judges decided that compulsory vaccinations did not breach
human rights law. On the face of it the judgement was so inverted
you gasp for air. If not having a vaccine infused into your body is not
a human right then what is? Ah, but they said human rights law
which has been specifically wri en to delete all human rights at the
behest of the state (the Cult). Article 8 of the European Convention
on Human Rights relates to the right to a private life. The crucial
word here is ‘except’:
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right EXCEPT
such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests
of national security, public safety or the economic wellbeing of the country, for the prevention
of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights
and freedoms of others [My emphasis].
No interference except in accordance with the law means there are no
‘human rights’ except what EU governments decide you can have at
their behest. ‘As is necessary in a democratic society’ explains that
reference in the judgement and ‘in the interests of national security,
public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the
prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or
morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others’
gives the EU a coach and horses to ride through ‘human rights’ and
sca er them in all directions. The judiciary is not a check and
balance on government extremism; it is a vehicle to enforce it. This
judgement was almost laughably predictable when the last thing the
Cult wanted was a decision that went against mandatory
vaccination. Judges rule over and over again to benefit the system of
which they are a part. Vaccination disputes that come before them
are invariably delivered in favour of doctors and authorities
representing the view of the state which owns the judiciary. Oh, yes,
and we have even had calls to stop pu ing ‘Covid-19’ on death
certificates within 28 days of a ‘positive test’ because it is claimed the
practice makes the ‘vaccine’ appear not to work. They are laughing
at you.