Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

I doubt the Cult intends it to go well. Yeadon said that you can put
any gene you like into the body through the ‘vaccine’. ‘You can
certainly give them a gene that would do them some harm if you
wanted.’ I was intrigued when he said that when used in the cancer
field the technique could turn genes on and off. I explore this process
in The Answer and with different genes having different functions
you could create mayhem – physically and psychologically – if you
turned the wrong ones on and the right ones off. I read reports of an
experiment by researchers at the University of Washington’s school
of computer science and engineering in which they encoded DNA to
infect computers. The body is itself a biological computer and if
human DNA can inflict damage on a computer why can’t the
computer via synthetic material mess with the human body? It can.
The Washington research team said it was possible to insert
malicious malware into ‘physical DNA strands’ and corrupt the
computer system of a gene sequencing machine as it ‘reads gene
le ers and stores them as binary digits 0 and 1’. They concluded that
hackers could one day use blood or spit samples to access computer
systems and obtain sensitive data from police forensics labs or infect
genome files. It is at this level of digital interaction that synthetic
‘vaccines’ need to be seen to get the full picture and that will become
very clear later on. Michael Yeadon said it made no sense to give the
‘vaccine’ to younger people who were in no danger from the ‘virus’.
What was the benefit? It was all downside with potential effects:
The fact that my government in what I thought was a civilised, rational country, is raining [the
‘vaccine’] on people in their 30s and 40s, even my children in their 20s, they’re getting letters
and phone calls, I know this is not right and any of you doctors who are vaccinating you
know it’s not right, too. They are not at risk. They are not at risk from the disease, so you are
now hoping that the side-effects are so rare that you get away with it. You don’t give new
technology … that you don’t understand to 100 percent of the population.
Blood clot problems with the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ have been
affecting younger people to emphasise the downside risks with no
benefit. AstraZeneca’s version, produced with Oxford University,
does not use mRNA, but still gets its toxic cocktail inside cells where