13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1202 Chapter 21: Development of Multicellular Organisms

axon

dynamic microtubules

lamellipodia

microtubules

filopodia

(A)

20 µm

(B)

(C)

(D)

actin

meshwork

actin

bundle

contacts an unfavorable surface, it withdraws; when it contacts a more favorable

surface, it persists longer, steering the growth cone in that direction. In this way,

the growth cone is guided by subtle variations in the properties of the surfaces

over which it moves. At the same time, it is sensitive to specific signaling molecules,

which—as we discuss next—can either encourage or hinder its advance.

A Variety of Extracellular Cues Guide

MBoC6

Axons

n22.234/22.73

to their Targets

Growth cones generally travel toward their targets along predictable routes,

according to programs stored in the memory of the particular neuron to which

they belong (Movie 21.7). In the simplest case, a growth cone can take a route that

has been pioneered by other neurites, which they follow by contact guidance. As a

result, nerve fibers in a mature animal are usually found grouped together in tight

parallel bundles (called fascicles or fiber tracts). Such crawling of growth cones

along axons is partly mediated by homophilic cell–cell adhesion molecules—

membrane glycoproteins that help a cell displaying them to stick to any other cell

that displays the same molecules. As discussed in Chapter 19, many homophilic

adhesion molecules fall into one of two main classes: they are members of either

the immunoglobulin superfamily, such as N-CAM, or the Ca 2+ -dependent cadherin

family, such as N-cadherin. Members of both families are generally present

on the surfaces of growth cones, of axons, and of various other cell types that

growth cones crawl over, including glial cells in the central nervous system and

muscle cells in the periphery of the body. Growth cones also migrate over components

of the extracellular matrix. When tested with neurons growing in a culture

dish, some of the matrix molecules, such as laminin, favor axon outgrowth, while

others, such as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, discourage it. But exactly how

the matrix functions to guide axons in intact animals remains to be discovered.

Growth cones are generally guided by a succession of different cues at different

stages of their journey, as summarized in Figure 21–73. Many of these cues

involve specific signaling molecules. Some of these are encountered in the extracellular

matrix, while others are attached to the plasma membrane of cells that

the growth cones touch. Another important part is played by chemotactic factors;

these are proteins secreted from cells that act as beacons at strategic points along

the path—some attracting, others repelling. The trajectory of commissural axons—

axons that cross from one side of the body to the other—provides a well-studied

example.

Commissural axons are a general feature of bilaterally symmetrical animals,

such as us, because they are required to coordinate behavior of the two sides of

the body. In the developing spinal cord of a vertebrate, for example, a large number

of neurons send their axonal growth cones ventrally toward the floor plate

(the same structure that we encountered earlier as a source of the morphogen

Sonic hedgehog—see Figure 21–69). The growth cones cross the floor plate and

then turn abruptly through a right angle to follow a longitudinal path up toward

the brain, parallel to the floor plate but never again crossing it (Figure 21–74). The

first stage of the journey depends on a concentration gradient of the signal protein

Netrin, secreted by the cells of the floor plate: the commissural growth cones sniff

their way toward its source.

Figure 21–72 Internal architecture

of a neuronal growth cone, as seen

in culture on a flat substratum. The

growth cone forms as an expansion of

the tip of the growing axon. (A) Image by

interference-contrast microscopy.

(B) Immunostaining to show microtubules

(green). (C) Immunostaining to show

actin filaments (red). (D) Diagram of the

cytoskeletal machinery. Filopodia form

and push forward by assembly of actin

filaments at the leading edge of the

growth cone. Microtubules stabilize the

directional decisions made by the actin-rich

protrusions. Filopodia adhering to the flat

substratum contract and pull the growth

cone forward. (Images by Chi-Hung Lin,

Paul Forscher Laboratory, Yale University,

New Haven, CT.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!