13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

932 Chapter 16: The Cytoskeleton

centrosome

containing centriole

pair

+

+ +

+

+ + +

+

+

+

+ + + + +

+

cut

here

with

needle

+

+

+

+

melanophore cell

+

+

+ + +

+

+

+

+ + +

+ + +++ +

severed

cell

fragment

+

+

+

+

WAIT

4 HOURS

+

new microtubuleorganizing

center lacking

centrioles

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+ +

+ + + +

+ + + +

+ +

cell fragment

+ + with

reorganized

microtubules

Figure 16–49 A microtubule array can

find the center of a cell. After the arm of a

fish pigment cell is cut off with a needle, the

microtubules in the detached cell fragment

reorganize so that their minus ends end up

near the center of the fragment, buried in a

new microtubule-organizing center.

apical plasma membrane. From this asymmetrical location, a microtubule array

extends along the long axis of the cell, with plus ends directed toward the basal

surface (see Figure 16–4).

Microtubule-Binding Proteins Modulate Filament Dynamics and

Organization

Microtubule polymerization dynamics are very different in cells than in solutions

of pure tubulin. Microtubules in cells

MBoC6

exhibit

m16.33/16.49

a much higher polymerization rate

(typically 10–15 μm/min, relative to about 1.5 μm/min with purified tubulin at

similar concentrations), a greater catastrophe frequency, and extended pauses in

microtubule growth, a dynamic behavior rarely observed in pure tubulin solutions.

These and other differences arise because microtubule dynamics inside the

cell are governed by a variety of proteins that bind tubulin dimers or microtubules,

as summarized in Panel 16–4.

Proteins that bind to microtubules are collectively called microtubule-associated

proteins, or MAPs. Some MAPs can stabilize microtubules against disassembly.

A subset of MAPs can also mediate the interaction of microtubules with other

cell components. This subset is prominent in neurons, where stabilized microtubule

bundles form the core of the axons and dendrites that extend from the

cell body (Figure 16–50). These MAPs have at least one domain that binds to the

microtubule surface and another that projects outward. The length of the projecting

domain can determine how closely MAP-coated microtubules pack together,

as demonstrated in cells engineered to overproduce different MAPs. Cells overexpressing

MAP2, which has a long projecting domain, form bundles of stable

microtubules that are kept widely spaced, while cells overexpressing tau, a MAP

with a much shorter projecting domain, form bundles of more closely packed

microtubules (Figure 16–51). MAPs are the targets of several protein kinases, and

phosphorylation of a MAP can control both its activity and localization inside

cells.

Microtubule Plus-End-Binding Proteins Modulate Microtubule

Dynamics and Attachments

Cells contain numerous proteins that bind the ends of microtubules and thereby

influence microtubule stability and dynamics. These proteins can influence the

Figure 16–50 Localization of MAPs in the axon and dendrites of a

neuron. This immunofluorescence micrograph shows the distribution of

the proteins tau (green) and MAP2 (orange) in a hippocampal neuron in

culture. Whereas tau staining is confined to the axon (long and branched in

this neuron), MAP2 staining is confined to the cell body and its dendrites.

The antibody used here to detect tau binds only to unphosphorylated tau;

phosphorylated tau is also present in dendrites. (Courtesy of James

W. Mandell and Gary A. Banker.) 10 µm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!