13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 12 END-OF-CHAPTER PROBLEMS

693

(A)

(B)

solution

gel

30 s

10 min

complex. They were initially identified using a genetic

trick. The yeast Ura3 gene, whose product is an enzyme

that is normally located in the cytosol where it is essential

for synthesis of uracil, was modified so that the protein

carried an import signal for the mitochondrial matrix.

A population of cells carrying the modified Ura3 gene in

place of the normal gene was then grown in the absence

of uracil. Most cells died, but the rare cells that grew were

shown to be defective for mitochondrial import. Explain

how this selection identifies cells with defects in components

required for import into the mitochondrial matrix.

Why don’t normal cells with the modified Ura3 gene grow

in the absence of uracil? Why do cells that are defective for

mitochondrial import grow in the absence of uracil?

MBP-mCherry

30 min

30 s

10 min

12–11 If the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR),

which is normally located in the cytosol, is engineered to

carry a mitochondrial targeting sequence at its N-terminus,

it is efficiently imported into mitochondria. If the modified

DHFR is first incubated with methotrexate, which binds

tightly to the active site, the enzyme remains in the cytosol.

How do you suppose that the binding of methotrexate

interferes with mitochondrial import?

importin-MBP-GFP

30 min

Figure Q12–2 FG-repeat gel and influx of proteins into the nucleus

(Problem 12–9). (A) Cartoon of the meshwork (gel) formed by pairwise

interactions between hydrophobic FG repeats. For FG-repeats

separated by 17 amino acids, as is typical, the mesh formed by

extended amino acid side chains would correspond to about 4 nm on

a side, which would be large enough to account for the characteristic

passive diffusion of proteins through nuclear pores. (B) Diffusion of

MBP-mCherry and importin-MBP-GFP into a gel of FG-repeats. In each

group, the solution is shown at left and the gel at right. The bright areas

indicate regions that contain the fluorescent proteins.

Problems p12.201/12.04

A. FG-repeats only form gels in vitro at relatively high

concentration (50 mM). Is this concentration reasonable

for FG repeats in the NPC core? In yeast, there are about

5000 FG-repeats in each NPC. Given the dimensions of the

yeast nuclear pore (35 nm diameter and 30 nm length),

calculate the concentration of FG-repeats in the cylindrical

volume of the pore. Is this concentration comparable

to the one used in vitro?

B. A second question is whether the diffusion of

importin-MBP-GFP through the FG-repeat gel is fast

enough to account for the efficient flow of materials

between the nucleus and cytosol. From experiments of

the type shown in Figure Q12–2B, the diffusion coefficient

(D) of importin-MBP-GFP through the FG-repeat gel was

determined to be about 0.1 μm 2 /s. The equation for diffusion

is t = x 2 /2D, where t is time and x is distance. Calculate

the time it would take importin-MBP-GFP to diffuse

through a yeast nuclear pore (30 nm) if the pore consisted

of a gel of FG-repeats. Does this time seem fast enough for

the needs of a eukaryotic cell?

12–10 Components of the TIM complexes, the multisubunit

protein translocators in the mitochondrial inner

membrane, are much less abundant than those of the TOM

12–12 Why do mitochondria need a special translocator

to import proteins across the outer membrane, when the

membrane already has large pores formed by porins?

12–13 Examine the multipass transmembrane protein

shown in Figure Q12–3. What would you predict would

be the effect of converting the first hydrophobic transmembrane

segment to a hydrophilic segment? Sketch the

arrangement of the modified protein in the ER membrane.

NH 2

1 3 5

2 4 6

COOH

CYTOSOL

ER LUMEN

Figure Q12–3 Arrangement of a multipass transmembrane protein

in the ER membrane (Problem 12–13). Blue hexagons represent

covalently attached oligosaccharides. The positions of positively and

negatively charged amino acids flanking the second transmembrane

segment are shown. Problems p12.24/12.19

12–14 All new phospholipids are added to the cytosolic

leaflet of the ER membrane, yet the ER membrane has a

symmetrical distribution of different phospholipids in its

two leaflets. By contrast, the plasma membrane, which

receives all its membrane components ultimately from the

ER, has a very asymmetrical distribution of phospholipids

in the two leaflets of its lipid bilayer. How is the symmetry

generated in the ER membrane, and how is the asymmetry

generated and maintained in the plasma membrane?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!