13.09.2022 Views

Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter by by Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

by virologists and published by the CDC and then explains what it

means:

Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several

common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549),

human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to

Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. ... Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of

infection and examined 24h post-infection.

No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than

10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only

modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.

Cowan explains that when virologists a empt to prove infection

they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test.

The first was humans. Exposure to humans was generally not done

for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any

coronavirus. The second possible host was animals. Cowan said that

forge ing for a moment that they never actually use purified virus

when exposing animals they do use solutions that they claim contain

the virus. Exposure to animals has been done with SARS-CoV-2 in

an experiment involving mice and this is what they found: None of

the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically-modified

mice, a statistically insignificant number lost weight and had slightly

bristled fur, but they experienced nothing like the illness called

‘Covid-19’. Cowan said the third method – the one they mostly rely

on – is to inoculate solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety

of tissue cultures. This process had never been shown to kill tissue

unless the sample material was starved of nutrients and poisoned as

part of the process. Yes, incredibly, in tissue experiments designed to

show the ‘virus’ is responsible for killing the tissue they starve the

tissue of nutrients and add toxic drugs including antibiotics and they

do not have control studies to see if it’s the starvation and poisoning

that is degrading the tissue rather than the ‘virus’ they allege to be in

there somewhere. You want me to pinch you? Yep, I understand.

Tom Cowan said this about the whole nonsensical farce as he

explains what that quote from the CDC paper really means:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!