19.02.2013 Views

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACILITATION IN INSECT PHOTOREUEPTORS<br />

DORA FlX VENTURA<br />

Universida<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> Sâo Paulo<br />

INTRODUW ION<br />

In 1954 a surprising phenomenon was reported by Ruck and Jphn on an<br />

hwertebrate preparation:if a strong flashwas presented to the eye the eledroretinogrnm<br />

(ERG) response to a succeeding equaly strong flash was increased, not <strong>de</strong>creased, as<br />

' would be expected. In the human visual system, our subjective experience when<br />

presented witl the light of a briglt flash is of a trnnqient blindness, which im plies the<br />

satmation of the neural network from the retina to the central nervous system . Not<br />

only at saturation levels, but also below, light adaptation has been shown to reduce<br />

sensitivity in m zmerous psychophysical ahd electrophysiological experiments. As a<br />

result, the theories about the functioning of the receptor meghanism have been always<br />

based on the reduction of sensitivity, due to light adaptation. It Fas therefore a<br />

startling surprise that an eye could $ve a peater response after a supposedly blinding<br />

light. 'l'he effect was called facilitation by the authors.<br />

The study of this effect was not, however, pmsued any ftlrther at that time,<br />

and this report by Ruck and Jnhn (1954) did not receive much atention in the '<br />

literature.<br />

Fae tation in the ERG of xveral sN <strong>de</strong>s<br />

It was only in the late sixties and early seventies that the subjed was studied<br />

again. Several authors reported facilitation in other invertebratrs besi<strong>de</strong>s the small<br />

crmtacean Lygia ocd<strong>de</strong>ntalîs used by Ruck and Jnhn (1954). lt was found in the ERG<br />

of several species (locmt: Giulio ald Lucaroni, 1967 ; fly and beetle: Du<strong>de</strong>k and<br />

Koopowitz, 1972, Du<strong>de</strong>k, 1975 ; ants: Ventura et al., 1976, Ventura and Puglia, 1977,<br />

Ventura, 1983; spi<strong>de</strong>r: Ynmashita and Tateda, 1976 and a crustacean, Strétten and<br />

Og<strong>de</strong>n, 1971).<br />

0. own work in ants 1ed to the conclusion that, at least in the species Atta<br />

sex<strong>de</strong>ns, facilitation is just as important as adaptation since it covers a sensitivitf range<br />

tlut is about eqlml to that covered by adaptation. 'lhis is to say that sensitivity in the<br />

ant ERG can be menipulated by experimental stimulation propammes to either<br />

increase (fadlitation) or <strong>de</strong>crease (adaptation) by the same extent. Facilitation,<br />

however, is not jlzst the reverse of adaptation. It has different properties with resped<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!