19.02.2013 Views

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

j *@ - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144<br />

a diffused light source. An exten<strong>de</strong>d source stimulates mnny neighboring receptors<br />

which contribute to adaptation of the MC response. tauglin (1984) shows that this is<br />

so in fly LMCS. The spatial response of MCs was not investigated in the present experi-<br />

ments and should be inclu (i ed in f u t uë e research esmcialy sinœ no spatial antagonism<br />

was found by Kien and Menzel (1977) in medula cels. .<br />

The photoreceptors divi<strong>de</strong> the light stimultls into three distinct signals (green,<br />

blue and UV). The UV signal seems to be transmited directly to the medula tlrough<br />

the long visual fibres, although according to Uibi (1981) the L1 monopolar cels also<br />

receive synapses from the lvf's in the lamina, together with synapses from the greenand<br />

blue-sensitive receptor axons. Also according to Uibi, the blue and green photoreceptor<br />

axons synapse onto the 12 monopolars, whereas the 1.3 cels receive inputs<br />

only from one type of photoreceptor, probably the green ones. 1.4 cells apparently<br />

receive<br />

no direct inputs from the rece' ptors but extend <strong>de</strong>ndrites to neighboring<br />

cartridges where they probably pick up inputs from the other MCs. How is this<br />

anatomicaly <strong>de</strong>duced wiring diagram utilized by the MCs? Pooling of the responses<br />

of several cells into one postsynaptic cel is often used as a strategy to improve the<br />

signal to noise ratio and this seems to be the case in the bee as evi<strong>de</strong>nced by the m uch<br />

steeper V/log I functions of the LMCS compared to those of retinular cels.<br />

Although spectral opponency might be expected from the 12 cels tl-augltlin,<br />

1984). Only one instance was recor<strong>de</strong>d in the unmarked cel mentioned above.<br />

Therefore, with tlkis possible exception, no kind of color coding can be infered from<br />

the responses recor<strong>de</strong>d, and it must be conclu<strong>de</strong>d that this is either pe' rformed by<br />

other cel types, not recor<strong>de</strong>d from in these experiments, or in subsequent nelzropiles.<br />

No opponency was found by Shaw (1981) in the lamina of Diptera either. It shoud<br />

be noted that Kien & Menzel (1977) reported color opponent cels in the medula of<br />

the bee.<br />

The only clearly discernible function of the recor<strong>de</strong>d MCs is that of highly<br />

sensitive <strong>de</strong>tectors of spatial or temporal contrast.<br />

References:<br />

Kien, J., Menzel, R. (1977). Cluomatic properties of interneurons in the optic lobes of the bee.<br />

I - Broad band neurons; 11 - Narrow band and color opponent nelzrons-l. Comp. Physiol. 111 :<br />

1 7-53 . .<br />

Laughlin, S. ( 1984). The roles of parallel channels in early visual processing by the artlropod<br />

compound eyc. In: M. A. Ali (ed.) Photoreception and Vision frl Inpertebrates. Plenum Press,<br />

New York. . '<br />

Laughlin, S., Hazdie, R.C. (1978). Com mon strategies for light adaptation in the peripheral visual<br />

systems of fly and dragonfly. J. Comp. Physiol. 128 : 319-340.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!