29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1042 PART IV Obstetric and Fetal Sonography

credentialing in NT do not demonstrate compliance with the

recommended use of the TI in monitoring acoustic output. 177

An easy way to reduce exposure is to reduce the TI and MI,

using the appropriate controls, and/or reduce the dwell time.

he 1999 statement of the British Medical Ultrasound Society,

reconirmed in 2009, declares 178 :

For equipment for which the safety indices are displayed

over their full range of values, the TI should always be less

than 0.5 and the MI should always be less than 0.3. When

the safety indices are not displayed, T max should be less than

1°C and MI max should be less than 0.3. Frequent exposure

of the same subject is to be avoided.

he British Medical Ultrasound Society has strict recommendations

for maximum allowed exposure time (T max ), depending

on the TI (Table 29.1).

Miller and Ziskin 57 demonstrated a logarithmic relationship

between exposure duration and temperature elevation in producing

harmful bioefects in animal fetuses. For temperatures below

43°C, the exposure time necessary for every 1°C increase in

temperature was decreased by a factor of 4. Using a maximum

“safe” exposure time of 4 minutes for a temperature elevation

of 4°C, based on these calculations, the following maximal

exposure times are allowable with no apparent obvious risks:

128 minutes at 1°C, 64 at 2°C, 16 at 3°C, and only 4 minutes at

4°C. Precautions are, naturally, of particular importance in early

gestation 179,180 and for Doppler exposure. 181

General recommendations from major professional organizations

follow. It is strongly recommended to consult various safety

statements published on these organizations’ websites. 182-192

1. A diagnostic ultrasound exposure that produces a maximum

in situ temperature rise of no more than 1.5°C above

normal physiologic levels (37°C) may be used clinically

without reservation on thermal grounds. 193

2. A diagnostic ultrasound exposure that elevates embryonic

and fetal in situ temperature above 41°C (4°C above normal

temperature) for 5 minutes or more should be considered

potentially hazardous. 193,194 In this regard, maternal temperature

elevation (e.g., from viral disease) should be considered

because body temperature of the fetus will also be

increased above normal. 48

TABLE 29.1 Duration of Obstetric

Ultrasound as a Function of

Thermal Index

Thermal Index (TI)

Recommended Upper Limit

0.7 60 min

1 30 min

1.5 15 min

2 4 min

2.5 1 min

Modiied from British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS) Safety

Group. Guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound

equipment. Ultrasound. 2010;18:52-59. 178

3. he risk of adverse efects is increased with the duration of

exposure (dwell time). 195

4. Based on available information, there is no reason to withhold

scanning in B-mode for medical indications. he risk

of thermal damage secondary to heating appears to be negligible.

193

5. M-mode ultrasound appears to be safe and not to cause

thermal damage (Fig. 29.5). 48

6. Spectral Doppler ultrasound may produce high intensities,

and routine Doppler examination during the embryonic

period is rarely indicated. 196

7. hree-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound

are based on two-dimensional (2D) B-mode imaging

with multiple 2D planes obtained and assembled (reconstructed)

into a volume. Hence the exposure is really to

B-mode and is, most likely, safe. Time of exposure has to be

watched to avoid long episodes of scanning to obtain the

“ideal” 3D volume (Fig. 29.6).

8. Education of ultrasound operators is crucial; the responsibility

for the safe use of ultrasound devices is shared between

the users and the manufacturers, who should ensure

the accuracy of the output display. 196

9. he AIUM advocates the responsible use of diagnostic

ultrasound and strongly discourages the nonmedical

use of ultrasound for “entertainment” purposes. he use

of ultrasound without a medical indication to view the

fetus, obtain a picture of the fetus, or determine the fetal

gender is inappropriate and contrary to responsible

medical practice. Ultrasound should be used by qualiied

health professionals to provide medical beneit to the patient.

28

10. Examinations should be kept as short as possible and with

as low MI and TI outputs as possible, but without sacriicing

diagnostic accuracy. Follow the as low as reasonably achievable

(ALARA) principle. 197

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic ultrasound has been used in medicine in general and

obstetrics and gynecology in particular for more than half a

century. No conirmed biologic efects have been described in

patients as a result of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. Such

efects, however, have been described in animals, oten at exposure

levels higher than, but also occasionally equivalent to, those used

in clinical practice. Epidemiologic information available is from

studies performed on instruments with acoustic output much

lower than current machines. Oten, exposure data are insuicient

and number of subjects too small. Furthermore, “no reported

efects” does not mean “no efects,” and such biologic efects may

be identiied in the future. Prudent use of ultrasound in fetal

scanning, following the ALARA principle, is therefore recommended.

Based on known mechanisms, there is no contraindication

to the use of B-mode, M-mode, 3D/4D, and color Doppler

ultrasound, when clinically indicated. However, special precaution

is necessary when applying pulsed Doppler ultrasound, particularly

in the irst trimester.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!