29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

536 PART II Abdominal and Pelvic Sonography

A

B

FIG. 15.8 Cervical Pseudomass. (A) Transverse TVS of cervix shows central hypoechoic area simulating a mass (calipers). (B) Sagittal TVS in

same patient shows the smooth elongated nature of the inner portion of the cervix (between arrows) in a retroverted uterus. The inner portion of

cervix is sometimes relatively hypoechoic to the outer portion and can simulate a mass.

I. Hypoplasia/agenesis

II. Unicornuate

III. Didelphys

Communicating

Noncommunicating

IV. Bicornuate

Fundal

One horn

No cavity

V. Septate

VI. Arcuate

VII. DES drug related

Complete

Partial

FIG. 15.9 Drawing of Müllerian Abnormalities. DES, Diethylstilbestrol. (Reprinted by permission from the American Society for Reproductive

Medicine. The American Fertility Society classiications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation,

tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944-955. 55 )

reference line across the superior aspect of the myometrial edge

in the two cornual regions), the distinction narrows to a septate

(or subseptate) versus arcuate uterus. he term “subseptate” or

“partial septate” is sometimes used when the septum does not

extend all the way from the fundus to the cervix. he 1-cm

fundal clet criterion to distinguish septate (or arcuate) from

bicornuate uterus is a commonly used criterion, although other

methods have been suggested. 54,56,65,66

he signiicance of and diagnostic criteria for an arcuate uterus

are unclear. Arcuate uterus refers to slight indentation of the

fundal myometrium into the endometrium. here is debate about

whether it is truly an anomaly or just a normal variant, and

further debate about whether it has clinical importance. 56,67 Part

of the diiculty in sorting out these questions arises from

uncertainty in what criteria one uses for the diagnosis. We are

also unaware of criteria for distinguishing mild arcuate uterus

from a normal uterus. Suggested criteria for diagnosis of an

arcuate uterus are an angle greater than 90 degrees at the end

point of the fundal indentation 65 or a less than 1-cm indentation

of myometrium into the endometrium (from a reference line

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!