29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 10 The Prostate and Transrectal Ultrasound 397

with TRUS guidance. MRI in-bore biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion

biopsies are being introduced but currently are less practical and

limited by access and costs. Cancer detection by mpMRI is

imperfect, and currently systematic biopsy cannot be avoided if

the MRI is negative.

Prostate cancer mortality has decreased since 1990 and there

has been a 75% reduction in the proportion of advanced disease

at diagnosis. his is attributed to opportunistic PSA screening

rather than new and improved therapies. 94 However, there are

concerns regarding generalized population screening. On one

hand, prostate cancer remains an important cause of morbidity

and mortality. On the other hand, prostate cancer afects older

men and typically has a 10-year course. Men of this age have

competing causes of mortality, so men with cancer oten die

with, and not from, their cancer. PSA screening has limited

sensitivity and speciicity. he diagnostic transrectal biopsy is

not infallible and has risks. here is a large background of lowvolume

low-grade (Gleason 6) cancer that is not likely to need

active therapy. his raises concerns regarding overdiagnosis and

overtreatment because therapy (surgery, radiation, hormones)

is not without risk and has signiicant side efects afecting quality

of life.

Several studies have evaluated the role of screening and therapy

for prostate cancer; some have shown beneit but others have

not, possibly because of study design limitations. 95,96 he major

quoted screening studies are the ERSPC (European Randomized

Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) 97 and the US study PLCO

(Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial). 98

he ERSPC irst consented and then randomized men into a

screening arm ofered PSA testing every 4 years and a control

arm. Biopsy was ofered for PSA above 3 ng/mL. At 13 years,

the screened arm showed a 29% decrease in mortality. To prevent

one cancer death, the number needed to invite for screening

was 781 and number needed to detect was 27. he Göteborg

subset of this study used a more real-world approach that irst

randomized men to be invited to screening and then obtained

consents. Biopsy was recommended for PSA above 2.5 ng/mL.

At 14 years, the investigators reported that the relative risk for

dying from cancer decreased to 0.44, with number needed to

screen of 293 and number needed to treat of 12. 97,99

he PLCO randomized men to annual PSA and DRE or usual

care groups. Biopsy indication was PSA above 4 ng/mL or palpable

nodule. At 13 years there was no signiicant diference in mortality.

Subsequent analysis showed that about 90% of the control arm

had undergone PSA screening either before or during the study.

True comparison was not possible because both screen and control

arms in efect were screened with PSA. 58,95,98

Considering these and other studies, in 2012 the US Preventive

Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a D recommendation against

prostate cancer screening (no net beneit or harms outweigh

beneits). 96 Notwithstanding decreasing prostate cancer mortality

since introduction of PSA screening, the USPSTF concluded

that any screening beneits were outweighed by the seeming lack

of overall beneit as shown especially in the PLCO study, the

risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, the risks of biopsy and

therapy, the large proportion of indolent disease that is unlikely

to be symptomatic, and competing mortality in older men. his

recommendation is strongly contested by many who believe that

it will decrease detection of prostate cancer while still treatable

and result in increasing morbidity and mortality; this appears

to be happening. 58,100,101 Also, urologic groups are promoting

“smart screening” that focuses screening on those most likely

to beneit and only ater shared decision making; to avoid harms

of active therapy, they recommend active surveillance of men

with seemingly indolent cancer (low-volume Gleason 6, also

called IDLE [indolent lesions of epithelial origin]). In general,

in men without risk factors, screening is recommended starting

at about age 50 years, is repeated at 1- to 4-year intervals, and

is stopped at about 70 years or with life expectancy below 10

years. A low (<1.0 ng/mL) baseline PSA between 40 and 49 years

of age is associated with low cancer risk and can be used to

further lengthen intervals between testing. Before biopsy, the

PSA should be repeated to allow normal luctuations from

producing a false-positive result. Antibiotics should not be given

to asymptomatic patients to lower PSA to test if there is an

asymptomatic infection causing the PSA elevation. In high-risk

groups such as those with a irst-degree relative with prostate

cancer or African-American men, screening should start at about

age 40. he new biomarkers, mpMRI, and risk calculators could

further be used to increase speciicity of screening tests and need

for biopsy or therapy. 58,73,88,95,102

Clinical Staging and Histologic Grading

Staging relates to extent of disease spread; grading relates to

histologic appearance of aggressiveness. Clinical staging of

prostate adenocarcinoma uses pretreatment parameters to estimate

extent of tumor, determine treatment options, and predict

prognosis by using DRE; PSA; biopsy characteristics; imaging

including TRUS, CT, isotope scan, and mpMRI; and nomograms

such as the Partin tables, which combine multiple characteristics

such as PSA, clinical stage, and Gleason score (Fig. 10.11, Table

10.1). 103 Pathologic staging requires histologic evaluation of

T1 (former A)

– not palpable

T3 (former C)

– local extension

capsule or SV

T2 (former B)

– palpable

– contained

T4 (former D)

– metatastic

FIG. 10.11 Contemporary prostate cancer staging using the tumornodes-metastasis

(TNM) classiication. SV, Seminal vesicle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!