Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

1510 PART IV Obstetric and Fetal Sonography
68. Seaward A, Kfouri J, Dodd J, et al. Does transvaginal ultrasound assessment
of the total cervical length and/or “funnelling to the stitch” predict preterm
birth in women with a cervical cerclage in situ? Presented at Society for
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Annual Meeting, 2008.
69. Maslovitz S, Hartoov J, Wolman I, et al. Cervical length in the early second
trimester for detection of triplet pregnancies at risk for preterm birth. J
Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(9):1187-1191.
70. Vayssiere C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27
weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin
pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(7):707-712.
71. Vayssiere C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22
and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pregnancies:
a French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;187(6):1596-1604.
72. Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, et al. Use of cervical ultrasonography
in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in triplet gestations. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2000;183(5):1108-1113.
73. Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, Ludmir J. Transvaginal ultrasonography
of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(3):553-556.
74. Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the
prediction of preterm birth ater treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):37-44.
75. Hershkovitz R, Sheiner E, Maymon E, et al. Cervical length assessment in
women with idiopathic polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2006;28(6):775-778.
76. Fait G, Har-Toov J, Gull I, et al. Cervical length, multifetal pregnancy reduction,
and prediction of preterm birth. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;
33(7):329-332.
77. Robyr R, Boulvain M, Lewi L, et al. Cervical length as a prognostic factor
for preterm delivery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic
laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2005;25(1):37-41.
78. Rebarber A, Carreno CA, Lipkind H, et al. Cervical length ater multifetal
pregnancy reduction in remaining twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;185(5):1113-1117.
79. Tsoi E, Akmal S, Rane S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in
threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(6):
552-555.
80. Rand L, Norwitz ER. Current controversies in cervical cerclage. Semin
Perinatol. 2003;27(1):73-85.
81. Grobman WA, Gilbert SA, Iams JD, et al. Activity restriction among women
with a short cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1181-1186.
82. Sciscione AC. Maternal activity restriction and the prevention of preterm
birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):232.e1-232.e5.
83. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG. Practice Bulletin
No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insuiciency. Obstet Gynecol.
2014;123(2 Pt 1):372-379.
84. Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, et al. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical
cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1984;91(8):731-735.
85. Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of
cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(8):724-730.
86. Anonymous. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical
cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol. 1993;100(6):516-523.
87. Brown JA, Pearson AW, Veillon EW, et al. History- or ultrasound-based
cerclage placement and adverse perinatal outcomes. J Reprod Med.
2011;56(9-10):385-392.
88. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography:
meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet
Gynecol. 2005;106(1):181-189.
89. Berghella V, Mackeen AD. Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated
cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm
birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):148-155.
90. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on
ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm
birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):663-671.
91. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage
for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester
cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):375.e1-375.e8.
92. Scheib S, Visintine JF, Miroshnichenko G, et al. Is cerclage height associated
with the incidence of preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated
cerclage? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):e12-e15.
93. O’Brien JM, Hill AL, Barton JR. Funneling to the stitch: an informative
ultrasonographic inding ater cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2002;20(3):252-255.
94. To MS, Alirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of
preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2004;363(9424):1849-1853.
95. Roman AS, Rebarber A, Pereira L, et al. he eicacy of sonographically
indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(6):
763-768.
96. Hui SY, Chor CM, Lau TK, et al. Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm
birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20 to 24
weeks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(4):
283-288.
97. Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Cervical pessary for
preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD007873.
98. Romero R, Stanczyk FZ. Progesterone is not the same as 17alphahydroxyprogesterone
caproate: implications for obstetrical practice. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):421-426.
99. Meis PJ, Klebanof M, hom E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery
by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(24):
2379-2385.