29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 26 The Extracranial Cerebral Vessels 929

A

B

C D E

FIG. 26.20 Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) Stenosis. (A) ICA stenosis of 50% to 69% diameter shows a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 187 cm/

sec. (B) Left ICA demonstrates a visible high-grade stenosis on color Doppler with end diastolic velocities (EDVs) of greater than 180 cm/sec and

PSVs that alias at greater than 350 cm/sec. This is consistent with a very high-grade stenosis. (C) Right carotid bulb seen in longitudinal projection

with color Doppler demonstrates a high-grade narrowing and spectral broadening with an approximately 500 cm/sec velocity in peak systole and

250 cm/sec in end diastole, consistent with an 80% to 95% stenosis. (D) and (E) Power transverse and long images demonstrate high-grade

stenosis of the ICA.

In these cases, correlation with color or power Doppler imaging

is essential to diagnose correctly the severity of the stenoses.

Velocity increases are focal and most pronounced in and immediately

distal to a stenosis, emphasizing the importance of

sampling directly in these regions. Moving further distal from

a stenosis, low begins to reconstitute and assume a more normal

pattern, provided a tandem lesion does not exist distal to the

initial site of stenosis. Spectral broadening results in the jets of

high-velocity low associated with carotid stenosis; however,

correlation with gray-scale and color Doppler images can deine

other causes of spectral broadening. An awareness of normal

low spectra combined with appropriate Doppler techniques can

obviate many potential diagnostic pitfalls.

he degree of carotid stenosis that is considered clinically

signiicant in the symptomatic or asymptomatic patient is in

evolution. Initially, it was thought that lesions causing 50%

diameter stenosis were signiicant; this perception changed as

more information was gathered from two large clinical trials.

As noted earlier, NASCET demonstrated that CEA was more

beneicial than medical therapy in symptomatic patients with

70% to 99% ICA stenosis. 7 ECST demonstrated a CEA beneit

when the degree of stenosis was greater than 60%. 8 Interestingly,

the method used to grade stenoses in the ECST study was

substantially diferent than that used in the NASCET trials. he

NASCET trials compared the severity of the ICA stenosis on

arteriogram with the residual lumen of a presumably more normal

distal ICA. he ECST methodology entailed assessment of the

severity of stenosis with a “guesstimation” of the lumen of the

carotid artery at the level of the stenosis. he ECST assessment

is more comparable to ultrasound’s visible assessment of the

degree of narrowing, whereas velocity tables currently in use

have been derived to correspond to the NASCET angiographic

determinations for stenosis. he ECST method for grading carotid

artery stenosis tends to give a more severe assessment of narrowing

than the NASCET technique (Fig. 26.21).

he initial NASCET trials retrospectively compared velocity

data obtained on the Doppler examination with angiographic

measurements of stenosis. No standardized ultrasound protocol

was employed by the numerous centers involved in the trials.

Despite the lack of uniformity, moderate sensitivity and speciicity

ranging from 65% to 77% were obtained for grading ICA stenoses

using Doppler velocities. If ultrasound technique is standardized

and criteria are validated in a given laboratory, peak systolic

velocity (PSV) and peak systolic ratios have proved to be an

accurate method for determining carotid stenosis. 109 he ECST

group compared three diferent angiographic measurement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!