29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 49 The Pediatric Spinal Canal 1677

A

B

FIG. 49.6 Normal Vertebral Sonographic Anatomy. (A) Sagittal view of the distal lumbar spine shows ine deinition of vertebral body

anatomy. The cartilaginous tips of the posterior spinous processes are visible (arrows), as well as the posterior margin of the cartilaginous portion

of the L3 vertebral body (curved arrow). (B) More distal sagittal view shows the cartilaginous posterior elements of the midsacral spine (arrows).

FIG. 49.7 Fluid Within Central Canal (Ventriculus Terminalis). Sagittal

view of the lumbar spine. This is a common, normal variant (arrow)

observed in many infants.

FIG. 49.8 Normal Filum Terminale. This can be clearly distinguished

from the nerve roots and should be less than 2 mm in diameter (arrows).

The external edges of the ilum are relatively bright compared with the

central portion of the ilum. See also Video 49.2.

Some infants have more prominent epidural fat, which also

should be considered a normal variant unless other signs suggest

an abnormal fatty mass (Fig. 49.10). Color Doppler ultrasound

can help localize the epidural venous plexus, anterior spinal

arteries, and paired posterior spinal arteries. Malposition,

compression, or distention of these vessels may help to distinguish

an abnormal mass within the vertebral canal from normal nerve

rootlets or epidural fat.

Determination of the position of the tip of the conus medullaris

is the most common indication for spinal ultrasound and

should always be included in a neonatal spine sonographic

examination. Approaches, all of which presume normal anatomy,

include (1) inding the lowest rib (presumably the 12th rib) on

lateral parasagittal scanning, following medially to the vertebral

body and counting down from this level; (2) deining the longitudinal

lumbosacral junction where S1 is the irst vertebral

body that tilts posteriorly (similar to a lateral spine radiograph)

and using that as a reference 12 ; (3) deining the distal end of the

thecal sac which is usually at S2 12 ; and (4) counting upward from

the last ossiied “sacral” vertebral body. he fourth approach can

be inaccurate because of the great variability in the ossiication

of the coccygeal vertebral bodies. 23 In general, ossiied coccygeal

vertebral bodies have a rounded central nucleus, whereas sacral

ossiication centers take on a more squared contour. If at least

two methods are applied and the vertebral assignment is the

same, it is likely correct. If these methods prove problematic

owing to variants of ossiication or segmentation anomalies, the

ultrasound transducer can be used to locate the tip of the conus,

mark the skin at that level with a radiopaque BB marker, and

obtain AP and lateral radiographs of the entire spine to determine

the corresponding vertebral level (Fig. 49.11). If this is done, a

lateral ilm is helpful because distortion from beam angulation

is less problematic. he AP spine view allows counting of ribs

and vertebral bodies with accuracy. he degree of ossiication

of the coccyx can also be assessed with this ilm. As the sonographer

gains experience in scanning the neonatal spine, the

variability in the shape of the cartilaginous coccyx becomes

evident (Fig. 49.12 and Video 49.3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!