29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

610 PART II Abdominal and Pelvic Sonography

A

B

FIG. 17.13 Abscess After Liver Mass Biopsy. (A) Transverse ultrasound image shows an 18-gauge biopsy needle in a 3-cm metastasis (arrow).

(B) Longitudinal image obtained 2 weeks later demonstrates a 6-cm debris-containing luid collection, anterior to left lobe of the liver, at biopsy

site. Subsequent aspiration and drain placement conirmed abscess.

underlying surgically correctable abnormality (e.g., perforated

bowel) is better treated with surgery.

Most percutaneous abscess drainage is performed to achieve

a cure without the need for surgery. In other patients, it is a

temporizing procedure that either postpones deinitive surgery

until the patient is stable (e.g., periappendiceal abscess drainage)

or permits a single-stage rather than a multistage surgery (e.g.,

peridiverticular abscess drainage). his is particularly desirable

in high-risk, medically complicated patients who present with

sepsis.

Contraindications to image-guided percutaneous catheter

drainage are all relative and are similar to those for percutaneous

biopsy. Although uncommon, lack of a safe route for percutaneous

drainage precludes the procedure. Unlike percutaneous biopsy,

in which bowel may be traversed without complication, luid

aspiration and percutaneous abscess drainage through bowel

should be avoided. Initial advancement of the drain through

normally contaminated bowel may seed a sterile luid collection,

resulting in iatrogenic infection. In addition, drain placement

through bowel may result in not only signiicant perforation but

also enteric istula.

Bleeding diathesis should be maximally corrected before

drain placement, and appropriate sedation (local and systemic)

should be given.

Imaging Methods

Selection of ultrasound or CT for guidance of aspiration and

drainage is inluenced by several factors, including the location

of the luid collection and the strengths and weaknesses of each

imaging modality, as discussed earlier. For example, a simple

paracentesis is best performed under ultrasound guidance (Fig.

17.14). More complicated drainage procedures in the retroperitoneum

or pelvis are best performed with CT guidance. More

supericial abdominal luid collections may be aspirated or

drained easily with ultrasound guidance. Obtaining a CT scan

before the procedure oten provides a more detailed view of

potentially deeper components to the collection and an anatomic

map for planning a safe access route.

FIG. 17.14 Ultrasound-Guided Paracentesis. Longitudinal image

shows a 5-French angiocatheter with side holes in the left lower peritoneal

cavity during a paracentesis.

In certain anatomic areas, such as the gallbladder, biliary

tract, and kidneys, combined ultrasound and luoroscopic

guidance of catheter placement may be preferred. he combined

use of ultrasound for initial needle placement and luoroscopy

for catheter placement, using the guidewire exchange technique

(Seldinger), optimizes the strengths of both guidance modalities.

Fluoroscopy can then be used to opacify the area drained and

conirm inal catheter placement and adequacy of drainage.

No single method of guidance for percutaneous drainage is

appropriate for all abdominal luid collections or abscesses. he

approach to any luid collection or potential abscess must be

tailored to the patient, procedure, and speciic circumstances.

Catheter Selection

Various catheters and introducing systems are available for

percutaneous abscess drainage; choice depends mainly on operator

preference. As with most interventional procedures, the clinician

or radiologist must be familiar and comfortable with the system

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!