29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 55 The Pediatric Hip and Other Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Applications 1921

In whites, overt dislocation is reported to be 1.5 to 1.7 per 1000

live births. 1,2 When lesser degrees of abnormality such as subluxation

are included, as many as 10 infants per 1000 live births

may show some features of the disorder. 3 Early detection of an

abnormality in the infant hip is the key to successful management.

If treatment is begun at a young age, most of the sequelae that

occur when DDH goes unrecognized until walking age can be

prevented. Clinical screening programs have been instituted,

and primary care physicians are taught to evaluate the hips as

part of the newborn physical examination. Historically, infants

with abnormal clinical examination indings were referred for

plain radiographic ilm examinations. Ultrasound has now become

the preferred technique for diagnosis and management of DDH

in the irst 6 months of life. 4 Hip sonography ofers clear advantages

over other imaging techniques in DDH. At the early age

of initial diagnosis in the irst 6 months of life, the femoral head

and acetabulum consist of cartilage components that are clearly

identiied by ultrasound. Real-time sonography allows assessment

of the hip in multiple planes, both at rest and with movement.

Ultrasound can replace radiographic studies and reduce radiation

exposure to the young infant.

he cause of DDH is multifactorial, with both physiologic

and mechanical factors playing a role. Maternal-fetal interaction

inluences the development of hip problems in both categories.

Maternal estrogens and hormones that afect pelvic relaxation

just before delivery are believed to lead to temporary laxity of

the hip capsule in the perinatal period. Most fetuses are exposed

to extrinsic forces in the later weeks of pregnancy because of

their increasing size and the diminishing volume of amniotic

luid. It is theorized that these forces, although gentle, can lead

to deformation if persistently applied. 5 An increased incidence

of DDH is reported in infants born in the breech position, in

infants with a positive family history of DDH, in irstborns, and

in pregnancy with oligohydramnios. Infants with skull-molding

deformities, congenital torticollis, and foot deformities are also

at increased risk for DDH. 6 Current reviews of risk have focused

on female breech delivery as the highest risk for DDH, and

imaging is recommended for these infants in published guidelines

from the major U.S. societies. 7-9 here is some evidence of familial

acetabular dysplasia, 10 although this is not considered a cause

in most cases.

Risk Factors for Development Dysplasia of

the Hip (DDH)

Family history of DDH

Firstborn child

Oligohydramnios

Breech delivery (female breech is the highest DDH risk

category)

Skull-molding deformities

Congenital torticollis

Foot deformities

he mechanism of a typical dislocation is thought to be a

gradual migration of the femoral head from the acetabulum

because of the loose, elastic joint capsule. In the newborn period,

the femoral head usually dislocates in a lateral and posterosuperior

position relative to the acetabulum. he displaced femoral head

can usually be reduced, and the joint components typically do

not have any major deformity. When dislocation is not recognized

in early infancy, the muscles tighten and limit movement. he

acetabulum becomes dysplastic because it lacks the stimulus of

the femoral head. Ligamentous structures stretch, and ibrofatty

tissue occupies the acetabulum. hus it becomes impossible to

return the femoral head to the acetabulum with simple manipulation;

a pseudoacetabulum may form along the inferior ilium

laterally where the dislocated femoral head rests.

Sonography is most oten used for evaluation of an infant

with an abnormal physical examination or a DDH risk factor,

such as positive family history, breech delivery, foot deformity,

or torticollis. Many reports attest to greater eicacy of

sonography compared with the clinical and radiographic

examination. 11-15

he routine screening of all newborn infant hips with ultrasound

has been a controversial issue. Based on a comparison

between clinical and sonographic screening with sonography,

Tonnis and colleagues 11 concluded that all newborns should be

screened for DDH with ultrasound because it detects more

pathologic joints than the clinical examination. In some European

countries, routine screening has been tried on a regional basis.

Critics of newborn screening programs note the high number

of infants undergoing treatment or requiring follow-up studies

(whether for minor instability or immaturity in acetabular

development), but it is also recognized that studying only infants

at risk will not eliminate late cases of DDH. 16,17

he current consensus in the United States is that the net

beneits of universal sonographic screening are not clearly established.

his opinion is based on the fact that there is a high rate

of spontaneous resolution of neonatal hip instability and dysplasia

and lack of evidence that intervention afects outcomes for the

population. 18 he American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has

published guidelines for pediatric examinations for the diagnosis

of DDH. 7 Screening by clinical examination is recommended,

and ultrasound is reserved for infants having abnormal examination

indings or risk factors. 19-22 If a frankly dislocated hip is

present, referral to orthopedic specialists is appropriate. When

the abnormal physical examination indings suggest less severe

hip instability shortly ater birth, sonography should not be done

until at least 3 to 4 weeks of age because hip instability may

resolve on its own. Experience has indicated that many infants

younger than 30 days have hip laxity that becomes normal ater

a few weeks without treatment. his is not a new observation;

the phenomenon was recognized clinically by Barlow. 1 It identiies,

however, a group of infants who need follow-up. Not all

infants’ hips become normal, and these patients require continued

observation. 11

Newborns with a risk factor for DDH should be checked at

4 to 6 weeks. his avoids multiple examinations in cases of

transient neonatal instability and immaturity related to maternal

hormones.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!