29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

454 PART II Abdominal and Pelvic Sonography

technique for screening for these more distal stenoses or

occlusions.

he evaluation of the celiac artery starts at its origin and

proceeds to its bifurcation into the splenic and common hepatic

arteries. As with all duplex Doppler studies, the sample volume

is advanced slowly through the celiac artery with waveforms

viewed every 2 to 3 mm and any abnormal sites documented

with an image. A standard set of waveforms from the proximal,

middle, and distal celiac artery is also obtained.

In patients with very severe celiac stenosis or occlusion, the

celiac artery oten receives its blood supply from the SMA through

the pancreaticoduodenal arcade. he blood low in the gastroduodenal

artery reverses, carrying the blood from the arcade

back to the common hepatic artery. Blood low then arrives at

the liver through the proper hepatic artery. To arrive at the

spleen, blood low from the gastroduodenal artery lows retrograde

in the common hepatic artery to reach the splenic artery.

Assessment of blood low direction in the common hepatic artery

should be part of the sonographic examination of the celiac

artery to detect cases in which this collateral low is present (see

Fig. 12.23).

he evaluation of the SMA starts at the origin and is carried

distally with viewing of waveforms every 2 to 3 mm, documenting

waveforms in the proximal, middle, and distal artery. he

examination can be performed with or without breath holding.

However, without breath holding, motion of the sample volume

with respect to the celiac artery and SMA oten occurs. With

the patient breathing, the sonographer may believe a waveform

is being obtained from the SMA when in fact the celiac artery

is being sampled or vice versa. Care should be exercised when

not using breath holding to guarantee that the proper vessel is

being evaluated. he SMA exam is also challenging because of

the very sharp turn it makes proximally. he turn creates problems

with accurate angle correction, and great care with the Doppler

angle is important.

he IMA has only a short trunk before it branches into the

let colic, sigmoidal, and superior hemorrhoidal arteries. In many,

perhaps most, patients the IMA is readily found, being the only

anterior branch of the abdominal aorta below the level of the

renal arteries. Its identiication can be impeded by patient size

and bowel gas and by the fact that it not as large of an artery as

the celiac artery or SMA. he IMA requires Doppler interrogation

only for 2 to 3 cm.

Finally, special maneuvers must be used when celiac artery

stenosis caused by the median arcuate ligament is suspected.

he traditional test is to remeasure low velocity in the artery

when the patient takes a deep inspiration. We have found this

test to be inconsistent. Reexamination of the artery with the

patient standing may be superior in its ability to show normalization

of velocities in the celiac artery in the setting of compression

by the median arcuate ligament. 120 Our experience supports that

remeasurement with the patient standing is greatly superior

compared with deep inspiration at normalizing blood low in a

compressed celiac artery (Fig. 12.26).

Mesenteric Artery Duplex Interpretation. Probably the

most widely accepted duplex criteria state that PSVs greater than

275 cm/sec in the SMA and 200 cm/sec in the celiac artery are

indicative of stenosis of greater than 70% in these arteries. 121

hese criteria are the ones suggested in the ACR Appropriateness

Criteria. 109 A more recent article suggests higher cutofs of 295 cm/

sec in the SMA and 240 cm/sec in the celiac artery as being

indicative of greater than 50% stenosis. 122 Other investigators

have found diastolic velocities to be a more accurate indicator.

One group found an end diastolic velocity (EDV) greater than

45 cm/sec with a PSV greater than 300 cm/sec to be an accurate

indicator of SMA stenosis greater than 50%. 123 Another group

found EDV greater than 70 cm/sec to be highly accurate for

diagnosing SMA stenosis of more than 50%, with an EDV greater

than 100 cm/sec needed to diagnose celiac artery stenosis of

over 50%. 124

In our laboratory, we have found the criteria using systolic

velocities (but not diastolic) to be highly sensitive but to result

in a substantial number of false-positive studies. Because of the

high sensitivity, we are conident that for a high-quality examination

that does not show systolic velocities higher than those

stated above (200 cm/sec in the celiac artery; 275 cm/sec in the

SMA), the diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischemia is excluded.

When velocities reach one of the thresholds given above, we

look for secondary features that support the diagnosis of signiicant

stenosis before we become conident that the stenosis

is real. hese secondary features include an increased diastolic

velocity and the presence of signiicant poststenotic turbulence

(Fig. 12.27). Color bruit is also supportive of severe stenosis. In

the absence of secondary indings, the radiologist must consider

the possibility of a false-positive result. In this setting, we have

a low threshold to recommend either CTA or MRA to assist in

the diagnosis (Fig. 12.28).

here have been no widely accepted duplex Doppler criteria

for what constitutes signiicant stenosis of the IMA. herefore

evaluation for severe stenosis must be based on qualitative more

than on quantitative data. High systolic velocity in the presence

of high diastolic velocity and poststenotic turbulence is indicative

of severe stenosis. A PSV greater than 200 cm/sec in the IMA

may be an accurate indicator of severe stenosis. 125 Stenosis of

the IMA may be an important contributor to the development

of mesenteric ischemia. We have seen and treated many patients

with mesenteric ischemia in whom a stenotic IMA was the sole

blood supply to the gut.

Treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia can be surgical or

endoluminal. Rates of restenosis with endoluminal treatment

are high, and thus, posttreatment surveillance is important. As

with all arteries treated with stents, restenosis is usually caused

by intimal hyperplasia, which is common within bare-metal

stents but even more common at the end of the stent (Fig. 12.29).

here is suggestion that covered stents may have a lower restenosis

rate in the mesenteric arteries. 126

Posttreatment duplex surveillance is confounded by Doppler

velocities oten remaining high in stented SMAs. 127,128 Some

speculate that this velocity elevation may be caused by a change

in the elastic properties of the arterial wall induced by its

incorporation of the stent.

he goal of stenting oten is not to restore normal low, but

only to restore enough low to make the patient asymptomatic.

hose arteries treated with stenting oten supply collateral low

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!