29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1100 PART IV Obstetric and Fetal Sonography

A B C

FIG. 31.10 Second-Trimester Markers for Trisomy 21. (A) Urinary tract dilation. Transverse scan through the fetal abdomen at 18 weeks

shows urinary tract dilation. The maximal diameter of the intrarenal renal pelvis measures 4 mm (calipers). Measurements are optimally performed

with the fetal spine at 12 or 6 o’clock. (B) Echogenic bowel. Sagittal scan through the fetal abdomen in the second trimester reveals a focus of

echogenic bowel (arrow). Note that the bowel is as bright as bone. See also Video 31.4. (C) Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF). Axial scan through

the fetal chest showing the four-chamber view of the heart with a “double” EIF in the left ventricle.

TABLE 31.3 Pooled Estimates of

Detection Rates (DRs), False-Positive Rate

(FPR), Positive and Negative Likelihood

Ratios (LR + and LR − )

Marker DR FPR LR + LR −

Nuchal fold 26.0 1.0 23.30 0.80

Short femur 27.7 6.4 3.72 0.80

Short humerus 30.3 4.6 4.81 0.74

Echogenic bowel 16.7 1.1 11.44 0.90

Echogenic intracardiac focus 24.4 3.9 5.83 0.80

Urinary tract dilation 13.9 1.7 7.63 0.92

Ventriculomegaly 7.5 0.2 27.52 0.94

Absent or hypoplastic nasal 59.8 2.8 23.27 0.46

bone

Aberrant right subclavian

artery

30.7 1.5 21.48 0.71

Modiied from Agathokleous M, Chaveeva P, Poon LC, et al.

Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound

Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(3):247-261. 109

fetuses. A receiver-operator characteristic curve for the prediction

of trisomy 21 based on biparietal diameter (BPD)/nasal bone

length (NBL) reveals that a cutof of 11 or greater identiies 69%

of trisomy 21 fetuses with a 5% FPR. Other authors recommend

measurement of less than 5th percentile or an absolute measurement

of less than 2.5 mm as thresholds to predict aneuploidy. 113-116

Vintzileos et al. 117 retrospectively evaluated the signiicance

of the nasal bone ossiication in fetuses referred for genetic

sonogram; 29 fetuses with trisomy 21 were compared to 102

euploid fetuses. Absence of the nasal bone was seen in 41% of

fetuses with trisomy 21 and none of the euploid fetuses. he

absence of the fetal nasal bone is as powerful a marker for trisomy

21 as the thickened nuchal fold. 118

Odibo et al. 119 suggested that evaluating the NBL as a multiple

of the median is the optimal method of using this marker. hese

investigators examined 3634 women at increased risk for aneuploidy

and nasal bone assessment was possible in 3197 women

(88%), 23 of whom had fetuses with trisomy 21. An NBL of less

than 0.75 MoM provided the best deinition of nasal bone

hypoplasia and had a sensitivity and speciicity of 49% and 92%,

respectively, compared with 61% and 84% for BPD/NBL greater

than 11. hese investigators favor the incorporation of absent

nasal bone as a major marker for trisomy 21 in the secondtrimester

genetic sonographic screening because of its ease of

identiication and better speciicity compared with MoM of less

than 0.75.

here is variation in the prevalence of a hypoplastic or absent

nasal bone depending on ethnicity. Cicero et al. 115 reported that

8.8% of patients of African Caribbean ancestry had an absent

or hypoplastic nasal bone, compared with 0.5% of Caucasian

fetuses, thus limiting the utility of this marker in patients of

African Caribbean heritage.

hree-dimensional ultrasound has been used to evaluate the

presence or absence of the fetal nasal bone. In 20 fetuses with

trisomy 21, Benoit and Chaoui 120 found 9 had either an absent

or a hypoplastic nasal bone on two-dimensional ultrasound.

he three-dimensional evaluation showed bilateral nasal bone

absence in six fetuses and unilateral nasal bone absence in

three. Prenasal thickness (PT) has recently been reported as a

useful marker for the detection of trisomy 21 in the second and

third trimester. In a retrospective evaluation of 159 fetuses with

trisomy 21, Vos et al. reported on the NBL and PT as well as

ratios of NBL/PT and prefrontal space ratios to identify fetuses

with trisomy 21. 121 hese ratios were not gestational age related

and at least one of these four indings was identiied on 95.3%

of fetuses with trisomy 21. he NBL/PT and prefrontal space

ratios individually identiied 86% and 80% of fetuses with trisomy

21. In the setting of a normal karyotype and otherwise normal

detailed imaging, the outcome for an isolated absent nasal bone is

favorable. 122

Femur Length

A short femur was one of the earliest recognized features in the

sonographic detection of trisomy 21. 123 he expected femoral

length (FL = −9.645 + 0.9338 × BPD) accounts for 94% of variation

in normal length. 124 Based on BPD, a measured-to-expected

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!