29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 42 Fetal Measurements 1461

8. Canick JA, Knight GJ, Palomak GE, et al. Low second trimester maternal

serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down’s syndrome. Br J

Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(4):330-333.

9. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline

for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound

Med. 2013;32(6):1083-1101.

10. Resnik R. Fetal growth restriction: evaluation and management. UpToDate.

2015.

11. hompson JL, Kuller JA, Rhee EH. Antenatal surveillance of fetal growth

restriction. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(9):554-565.

12. Wegienka G, Baird DD. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual

period with prospectively recorded dates. J Womens Health (Larchmt).

2005;14(3):248-252.

13. Savitz D, Terry Jr J, Dole N, et al. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last

menstrual period, ultrasound, or their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol.

2002;187(6):1660-1666.

14. Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening

for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(5):

613-620.

15. Verburg BO, Steegers EAP, De Ridder M, et al. New charts for ultrasound

dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from

a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(4):

388-396.

16. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG). Committee

opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol.

2014;124(4):863-866.

17. Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Washington AE. First- vs second-trimester

ultrasound: the efect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J

Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):703.e1-703.e6.

18. Kalish RB, haler HT, Chasen ST, et al. First- and second-trimester ultrasound

assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):

975-978.

19. Campbell S, Wilkin D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference

in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.

1975;82(9):689-697.

20. Higginbottom J, Slater J, Porter G, Whitield CR. Estimation of fetal weight

from ultrasonic measurement of trunk circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.

1975;82(9):698-701.

21. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. he estimation of fetal

weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128(8):

881-892.

22. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, et al. An evaluation of two equations

for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol.

1982;142(1):47-54.

23. hurnau GR, Tamura RK, Sabbagha R, et al. A simple estimated fetal weight

equation based on real-time ultrasound measurements of fetuses less than

thirty-four weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145(5):557-561.

24. Jordaan HV. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound.

1983;11(2):59-66.

25. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computerassisted

analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152(2):

497-501.

26. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with

the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am

J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-337.

27. Birnholz JC. An algorithmic approach to accurate ultrasonic fetal weight

estimation. Invest Radiol. 1986;21(7):571-576.

28. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, et al. Fetal weight estimation formulas

with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements. Am

J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(2):410-414.

29. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. First, do no harm… To early pregnancies.

J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(5):685-689.

30. Bradley WG, Fiske CE, Filly RA. he double sac sign of early intrauterine

pregnancy: use in exclusion of ectopic pregnancy. Radiology. 1982;143(1):

223-226.

31. Bree RL, Edwards M, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Transvaginal sonography in

the evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with HCG level. AJR

Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(1):75-79.

32. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Double sac sign and intradecidual sign in early

pregnancy: interobserver reliability and frequency of occurrence. J Ultrasound

Med. 2013;32(7):1207-1214.

33. Daya S, Woods S, Ward S, et al. Early pregnancy assessment with transvaginal

ultrasound scanning. CMAJ. 1991;144(4):441-446.

34. Jain KA, Hamper UM, Sanders RC. Comparison of transvaginal and

transabdominal sonography in the detection of early pregnancy and its

complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(6):1139-1143.

35. Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length”

measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82(9):702-710.

36. MacGregor SN, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, et al. Underestimation of gestational

age by conventional crown-rump length dating curves. Obstet

Gynecol. 1987;70(3 Pt 1):344-348.

37. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. he developing human: clinically

oriented embryology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013.

38. Ioannou C, Sarris I, Hoch L, et al. Standardisation of crown-rump length

measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:38-41.

39. Doubilet PM. Should a irst trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?

Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(5):307-309.

40. Kurtz AB, Wapner RJ, Kurtz RJ, et al. Analysis of biparietal diameter as an

accurate indicator of gestational age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1980;8(4):

319-326.

41. Doubilet PM, Greenes RA. Improved prediction of gestational age

from fetal head measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(4):797-

800.

42. Law RG, MacRae KD. Head circumference as an index of fetal age. J

Ultrasound Med. 1982;1(7):281-288.

43. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal abdominal circumference

as a predictor of menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139(2):

367-370.

44. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Improved prediction of gestational age in the

late third trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;12(11):647-653.

45. Jeanty P, Rodesch F, Delbeke D, Dumont JE. Estimation of gestational

age from measurements of fetal long bones. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;

3(2):75-79.

46. Honarvar M, Allahyari M, Dehbashi S. Assessment of gestational age based

on ultrasonic femur length ater the irst trimester: a simple mathematical

correlation between gestational age (GA) and femur length (FL). Int J

Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(3):335-340.

47. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Computer assisted analysis of

fetal age in the third trimester using multiple fetal growth parameters. J

Clin Ultrasound. 1983;11(6):313-316.

48. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal biparietal diameter: rational

choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement. AJR Am J

Roentgenol. 1982;138(5):871-874.

49. Papageorghiou AT, Sarris I, Ioannou C, et al. Ultrasound methodology

used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st

Project. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:27-32.

50. Hadlock FP, Kent WR, Loyd JL, et al. An evaluation of two methods for

measuring fetal head and body circumferences. J Ultrasound Med.

1982;1(9):359-360.

51. Goldstein RB, Filly RA, Simpson G. Pitfalls in femur length measurements.

J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(4):203-207.

52. Smulian JC, Ranzini AC, Ananth CV, et al. Comparison of three sonographic

circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight. Obstet

Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):692-696.

53. Doubilet PM. Should a irst trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?

Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(5):307-309.

54. Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy

of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol.

1991;157(6):1275-1277.

55. Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Sollien R, Kiserud T. Fetal age assessment based

on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur

length to head circumference ratios. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.

2005;84(8):725-733.

56. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal

weight. he value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.

Radiology. 1984;150(2):535-540.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!