29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1114 PART IV Obstetric and Fetal Sonography

212. Joergensen MW, Niemann I, Rasmussen AA, et al. Triploid pregnancies:

genetic and clinical features of 158 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol.

2014;211(4):370 e1-370 e19.

213. McFadden DE, Robinson WP. Phenotype of triploid embryos. J Med Genet.

2006;43(7):609-612.

214. Jauniaux E, Brown R, Rodeck C, Nicolaides KH. Prenatal diagnosis of

triploidy during the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol.

1996;88(6):983-989.

215. Jauniaux E, Brown R, Snijders RJ, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis of triploidy.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(3):550-554.

216. Rijhsinghani A, Yankowitz J, Strauss RA, et al. Risk of preeclampsia in

second-trimester triploid pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):

884-888.

217. Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Current management of complete and partial

molar pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1994;39(3):139-146.

218. Baena N, De Vigan C, Cariati E, et al. Turner syndrome: evaluation of

prenatal diagnosis in 19 European registries. Am J Med Genet A.

2004;129A(1):16-20.

219. Wax JR, Blakemore KJ, Baser I, Stetten G. Isolated fetal ascites detected by

sonography: an unusual presentation of Turner syndrome. Obstet Gynecol.

1992;79(5 Pt 2):862-863.

220. Azar GB, Snijders RJ, Gosden C, Nicolaides KH. Fetal nuchal cystic

hygromata: associated malformations and chromosomal defects. Fetal Diagn

her. 1991;6(1-2):46-57.

221. Papp C, Beke A, Mezei G, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome:

report on 69 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(6):711-717.

222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cell-free DNA

screening for fetal aneuploidy. Practice Bulletin. 2015;No. 640.

223. Bianchi DW, Platt LD, Goldberg JD, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy

detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol.

2012;119(5):890-901.

224. Zimmermann B, Hill M, Gemelos G, et al. Noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy

testing of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, using targeted sequencing of

polymorphic loci. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(13):1233-1241.

225. Sparks AB, Struble CA, Wang ET, et al. Noninvasive prenatal detection and

selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation

for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):319.e1-

319.e9.

226. Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal

blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound

Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):249-266.

227. Cuckle H, Benn P, Pergament E. Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy

as a clinical service. Clin Biochem. 2015;48(15):932-941.

228. Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard

prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):799-808.

229. Pergament E, Cuckle H, Zimmermann B, et al. Single-nucleotide

polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening in a high-risk and

low-risk cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):210-218.

230. Ashoor G, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, et al. Fetal fraction in maternal plasma

cell-free DNA at 11-13 weeks’ gestation: relation to maternal and fetal

characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(1):26-32.

231. Bevilacqua E, Gil MM, Nicolaides KH, et al. Performance of screening for

aneuploidies by cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in twin pregnancies.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):61-66.

232. Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for

noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):

1589-1597.

233. Petersen OB, Vogel I, Ekelund C, et al. Potential diagnostic consequences

of applying non-invasive prenatal testing: population-based study from a

country with existing irst-trimester screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.

2014;43(3):265-271.

234. Norton ME, Jellife-Pawlowski LL, Currier RJ. Chromosome abnormalities

detected by current prenatal screening and noninvasive prenatal testing.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(5):979-986.

235. Benachi A, Letourneau A, Kleininger P, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis in

maternal plasma in cases of fetal abnormalities detected on ultrasound

examination. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1330-1337.

236. Shani H, Goldwaser T, Keating J, Klugman S. Chromosomal abnormalities

not currently detected by cell-free fetal DNA: a retrospective analysis at a

single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):729.e1-3729.e11.

237. Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal

microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and metaanalysis.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):610-620.

238. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus

karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):

2175-2184.

239. Drury S, Williams H, Trump N, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis

of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(10):

1010-1017.

240. van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. Accuracy of abnormal

karyotypes ater the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic

villi. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(12):956-969.

241. Aina-Mumuney A, Wood ED, Corson VL, et al. Clinical consequences of

an increasing trend of preferential use of cultured villi for molecular diagnosis

by CVS. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(4):332-334.

242. Ledbetter DH, Zachary JM, Simpson JL, et al. Cytogenetic results from the

U.S. Collaborative Study on CVS. Prenat Diagn. 1992;12(5):317-345.

243. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic indings on chorionic

villus sampling (CVS)—diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and

non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992.

Prenat Diagn. 1997;17(9):801-820.

244. Brun JL, Mangione R, Gangbo F, et al. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of

chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases. Prenat Diagn.

2003;23(4):295-301.

245. Evans MI, Andriole S, Evans SM. Genetics: update on prenatal screening

and diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015;42(2):193-208.

246. Wolstenholme J. Conined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9,

16, and 22: their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage

compartmentalization. Prenat Diagn. 1996;16(6):511-524.

247. Grati FR, Bajaj K, Malvestiti F, et al. he type of feto-placental aneuploidy

detected by cfDNA testing may inluence the choice of conirmatory

diagnostic procedure. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(10):994-998.

248. Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage

following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16-26.

249. Lippman A, Tomkins DJ, Shime J, Hamerton JL. Canadian multicentre

randomized clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis.

Final report. Prenat Diagn. 1992;12(5):385-408.

250. Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME. Chorionic villus sampling compared

with amniocentesis and the diference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet

Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 1):612-616.

251. Firth HV, Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, et al. Severe limb abnormalities ater

chorion villus sampling at 56-66 days’ gestation. Lancet. 1991;337(8744):

762-763.

252. Froster UG, Jackson L. Limb defects and chorionic villus sampling:

results from an international registry, 1992-94. Lancet. 1996;347(9000):

489-494.

253. World Health Organization WHO/PAHO consultation on CVS. Evaluation

of chorionic villus sampling safety. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19(2):97-99.

254. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice

Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(6):1459-1467.

255. Borgida AF, Mills AA, Feldman DM, et al. Outcome of pregnancies

complicated by ruptured membranes ater genetic amniocentesis. Am J

Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(4):937-939.

256. Devlieger R, Millar LK, Bryant-Greenwood G, et al. Fetal membrane healing

ater spontaneous and iatrogenic membrane rupture: a review of current

evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1512-1520.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!