Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

CHAPTER 9 The Kidney and Urinary Tract 377
85. Sierakowski R, Finlayson B, Landes RR, et al. he frequency of urolithiasis
in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States. Invest Urol.
1978;15(6):438-441.
86. Spirnak JP, Resnick M, Banner MP. Calculus disease of the urinary tract:
general considerations. In: Pollack HM, editor. Clinical urography: an atlas
and textbook of urological imaging. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990. p.
1752-1758.
87. Furlan A, Federle MP, Yealy DM, et al. Nonobstructing renal stones
on unenhanced CT: a real cause for renal colic? AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2008;190(2):W125-W127.
88. Ripolles T, Errando J, Agramunt M, Martinez MJ. Ureteral colic: US versus
CT. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29(2):263-266.
89. Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones:
incidence of associated urinary tract indings. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1996;166(6):1319-1322.
90. Smith RC, Rosenield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute lank pain: comparison of
non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology.
1995;194(3):789-794.
91. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenield AT. Diagnosis of acute lank pain:
value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1):97-101.
92. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary
helical CT versus selective helical CT ater unenhanced radiography and
sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(2):379-387.
93. Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, et al. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of
ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(886):901-904.
94. Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J, et al. Suspected ureteral colic: plain
ilm and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66
patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(1):129-136.
95. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on diagnosis and conservative
management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):468-474.
96. Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G. Diagnostic performance of low-dose
CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2008;191(2):396-401.
97. Rubens DJ, Bhatt S, Nedelka S, Cullinan J. Doppler artifacts and pitfalls.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44(6):805-835.
98. Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, Han D. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts
from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. AJR Am
J Roentgenol. 2001;176(6):1441-1445.
99. Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi:
in vitro study of “twinkling artifact” revealed by color-low sonography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):1055-1060.
100. Dillman JR, Kappil M, Weadock WJ, et al. Sonographic twinkling artifact
for renal calculus detection: correlation with CT. Radiology. 2011;259(3):
911-916.
101. Cronan JJ, Tublin ME. Role of the resistive index in the evaluation of acute
renal obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(2):377-378.
102. Laing FC, Benson CB, DiSalvo DN, et al. Distal ureteral calculi: detection
with vaginal US. Radiology. 1994;192(2):545-548.
103. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Paulson EK, Carrol BA. Distal ureteral
calculi: detection with transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1994;163(5):1151-1153.
104. Burge HJ, Middleton WD, McClennan BL, Hildebolt CF. Ureteral jets in
healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison
with color Doppler US. Radiology. 1991;180(2):437-442.
105. Price CI, Adler RS, Rubin JM. Ultrasound detection of diferences in density.
Explanation of the ureteric jet phenomenon and implications for new
ultrasound applications. Invest Radiol. 1989;24(11):876-883.
106. Baker SM, Middleton WD. Color Doppler sonography of ureteral jets in
normal volunteers: importance of the relative speciic gravity of urine in
the ureter and bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(4):773-775.
107. de Bessa Jr J, Denes FT, Chammas MC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of color
Doppler sonographic study of the ureteric jets in evaluation of hydronephrosis.
J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4(2):113-117.
108. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal
duplex Doppler and conventional US. Radiology. 1993;186(3):685-688.
109. Tublin ME, Dodd 3rd GD, Verdile VP. Acute renal colic: diagnosis with
duplex Doppler US. Radiology. 1994;193(3):697-701.
110. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Cauni V, Nita G. Value of duplex Doppler
ultrasonography in renal colic. Eur Urol. 2002;41(1):71-78.
111. Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF. Review. he resistive index in renal Doppler
sonography: where do we stand? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(4):
885-892.
112. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Murphy ME. Correlation between renal vascular
resistance, pulse pressure, and the resistive index in isolated perfused rabbit
kidneys. Radiology. 1999;213(1):258-264.
113. Murphy ME, Tublin ME. Understanding the Doppler RI: impact of renal
arterial distensibility on the RI in a hydronephrotic ex vivo rabbit kidney
model. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19(5):303-314.
114. Bude RO, Rubin JM. Relationship between the resistive index and vascular
compliance and resistance. Radiology. 1999;211(2):411-417.
115. Banner M. Nephrocalcinosis. In: Pollack HM, editor. Clinical urography:
an atlas and textbook of urological imaging. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990.
p. 1768-1775.
116. al-Murrani B, Cosgrove DO, Svensson WE, Blaszczyk M. Echogenic rings—an
ultrasound sign of early nephrocalcinosis. Clin Radiol. 1991;44(1):49-51.
117. Patriquin HB, O’Regan S. Medullary sponge kidney in childhood. AJR Am
J Roentgenol. 1985;145(2):315-319.
118. Khoory BJ, Andreis IA, Vino L, Fanos V. Transient hyperechogenicity of
the renal medullary pyramids: incidence in the healthy term newborn. Am
J Perinatol. 1999;16(9):463-468.
119. Patriquin H, Robitaille P. Renal calcium deposition in children: sonographic
demonstration of the Anderson-Carr progression. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1986;146(6):1253-1256.
120. Bennington JL, Beckwith JB. Tumors of the kidney, renal pelvis, and ureter.
Washington, DC: US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1975.
121. Bennington JL, Laubscher FA. Epidemiologic studies on carcinoma of the
kidney. I. Association of renal adenocarcinoma with smoking. Cancer.
1968;21(6):1069-1071.
122. Cohen AJ, Li FP, Berg S, et al. Hereditary renal-cell carcinoma associated
with a chromosomal translocation. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(11):592-595.
123. Choyke PL, Glenn GM, Walther MM, et al. Hereditary renal cancers.
Radiology. 2003;226(1):33-46.
124. Choyke PL, Glenn GM, Walther MM, et al. von Hippel-Lindau
disease: genetic, clinical, and imaging features. Radiology. 1995;194(3):
629-642.
125. Choyke PL, Glenn GM, Walther MM, et al. he natural history of renal
lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease: a serial CT study in 28 patients. AJR
Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(6):1229-1234.
126. Linehan WM, Vasselli J, Srinivasan R, et al. Genetic basis of cancer of the
kidney: disease-speciic approaches to therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(18
Pt 2):6282s-6289s.
127. Takase K, Takahashi S, Tazawa S, et al. Renal cell carcinoma associated
with chronic renal failure: evaluation with sonographic angiography.
Radiology. 1994;192(3):787-792.
128. Levine E, Grantham JJ, Slusher SL, et al. CT of acquired cystic kidney
disease and renal tumors in long-term dialysis patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1984;142(1):125-131.
129. Kim JK, Kim TK, Ahn HJ, et al. Diferentiation of subtypes of renal
cell carcinoma on helical CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(6):
1499-1506.
130. Skinner DG, Colvin RB, Vermillion CD, et al. Diagnosis and management
of renal cell carcinoma. A clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases. Cancer.
1971;28(5):1165-1177.
131. Curry NS. Small renal masses (lesions smaller than 3 cm): imaging evaluation
and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(2):355-362.
132. Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB, et al. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal
masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology.
1996;198(3):785-788.
133. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, et al. Multiphasic helical CT of
the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of
small (< 3-cm) renal masses. Radiology. 1997;202(1):211-217.
134. Urban BA. he small renal mass: what is the role of multiphasic helical
scanning? Radiology. 1997;202(1):22-23.
135. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison
of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic
phases. Radiology. 1996;200(3):753-758.
136. Zeman RK, Zeiberg A, Hayes WS, et al. Helical CT of renal masses: the
value of delayed scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(3):771-776.