29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 39 The Fetal Urogenital Tract 1355

Ultrasound grading system of hydronephrosis

Grade 0

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

FIG. 39.26 Society for Fetal Urology Grading System. This classiication

is based on the appearance of the renal pelvis, calyces, and

renal parenchyma. Grade 0: no hydronephrosis; intact central renal

complex. Grade 1: only dilated renal pelvis; there is some luid in the

renal pelvis. Grade 2: dilated renal pelvis and a few calyces are visible.

Grade 3: all the calyces are dilated. Grade 4: further dilation of renal

pelvis and calyces, with thin renal parenchyma. (Modiied from Baskin

LS. Prenatal hydronephrosis. In: Baskin LS, Kogan B, Duckett J, editors.

Handbook of pediatric urology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.

p. 15. 281 )

diferentiation, cortical cysts); (5) ureteral abnormalities; (6)

bladder abnormalities; and (7) oligohydramnios. 133

he classiication is based on the presence of the most concerning

feature. he proposed thresholds for normal RPD are less

than 4 mm at 16 to 27 weeks and less than 7 mm at 28 weeks or

more (Table 39.4).

he detection of UT dilation (pyelectasis) is important for

two reasons: aneuploidy and postnatal uropathy. he signiicance

of UT dilation as a marker for aneuploidy is discussed in Chapter

31. UT dilation is usually an isolated inding, but a detailed

ultrasound examination should be performed to detect other

UT pathologic processes and nonrenal anomalies. UT dilation

may be the irst manifestation of obstructive uropathy. Studies

that have correlated outcome with UT dilation varied widely in

methodology, using diferent RPD cut-ofs and diferent outcome

measures. In a meta-analysis of 17 studies (104,572 patients

screened), Lee and colleagues examined antenatal hydronephrosis

(1308 subjects) as a predictor of postnatal outcome. 149 he risk

of any postnatal pathology was 12% for mild, 45% for moderate,

and 88% for severe hydronephrosis (Table 39.5). here was a

signiicant increase in the risk of postnatal pathology with

increasing degree of hydronephrosis. A prospective study by

Sairam and colleagues 131 reported on the natural history of

hydronephrosis diagnosed in 227 fetuses on midtrimester

ultrasound in an unselected population. hey demonstrated that

96% of the fetuses with mild hydronephrosis (RPD > 4 mm and

< 7 mm at 18-23 weeks) experienced resolution in either the

third trimester or the early neonatal period; none required

postnatal surgery. However, approximately one in three fetuses

with moderate to severe hydronephrosis (RPD > 7 mm or presence

of caliectasis at 18-23 weeks) required postnatal surgery. A

meta-analysis by Sidhu and colleagues combined data from seven

studies and reported on the indings of serial postnatal renal

sonography in children with isolated antenatal hydronephrosis. 150

here was resolution, improvement, or stabilization of hydronephrosis

in 98% of patients with SFU grades 1 and 2 and stabilization

of hydronephrosis in 51% of those with SFU grades 3 and

4. hese results suggest that mild hydronephrosis is a relatively

benign condition.

In utero progression also increases the likelihood of postnatal

uropathy and urologic surgery. 141,151-153 An abnormal RPD in the

third trimester is the best ultrasound criterion to predict postnatal

uropathy. 128,141 In cases of mild isolated UT dilation, serial

follow-up scans every 3 to 4 weeks are not necessary, but a repeat

ultrasound in the third trimester is recommended. As prenatal

resolution has been shown to be frequent, 131,142 this will also

identify a group in which postnatal follow-up may not even be

necessary. 133 In general, the larger the RPD, the lower the spontaneous

resolution rate, the more likely it is associated with

postnatal pathology, and the greater the need for postnatal

surgery. 131,150,154-156

A risk stratiication of prenatal UT dilation into a low-risk

group and an increased-risk group has been proposed. 133 Fetuses

with isolated mild UT dilation are classiied in the low-risk group

(Fig. 39.27) if the RPD is 4 to less than 7 mm at less than 28

weeks, and 7 to less than 10 mm at 28 weeks or more. Fetuses

with greater degrees of UT dilation (RPD ≥ 7 mm at <28 weeks

and ≥ 10 mm at ≥28 weeks) or any one of several indings—

peripheral calyceal dilation, abnormal renal parenchymal thickness

or appearance, dilated ureter, abnormal bladder, or

oligohydramnios—are considered at increased risk for postnatal

uropathy (Fig. 39.28).

he majority of infants identiied prenatally as having UT

dilation are asymptomatic at birth. Pediatric nephrologists

and urologists vary greatly in their management of antenatally

diagnosed UT dilation, because an evidence-based protocol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!