Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

CHAPTER 35 The Fetal Spine 1241
62. Norem CT, Schoen EJ, Walton DL, et al. Routine ultrasonography compared
with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein for neural tube defect screening.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):747-752.
63. Filly RA, Callen PW, Goldstein RB. Alpha-fetoprotein screening
programs: what every obstetric sonologist should know. Radiology.
1993;188(1):1-9.
64. Ames MD, Schut L. Results of treatment of 171 consecutive myelomeningoceles,
1963 to 1968. Pediatrics. 1972;50(3):466-470.
65. Kollias SS, Goldstein RB, Cogen PH, Filly RA. Prenatally detected myelomeningoceles:
sonographic accuracy in estimation of the spinal level.
Radiology. 1992;185(1):109-112.
66. Aaronson OS, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bruner JP, et al. Myelomeningocele:
prenatal evaluation—comparison between transabdominal US and MR
imaging. Radiology. 2003;227(3):839-843.
67. von Koch CS, Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Barkovich AJ. Fetal magnetic resonance
imaging enhances detection of spinal cord anomalies in patients
with sonographically detected bony anomalies of the spine. J Ultrasound
Med. 2005;24(6):781-789.
68. Biggio Jr JR, Owen J, Wenstrom KD, Oakes WJ. Can prenatal ultrasound
indings predict ambulatory status in fetuses with open spina biida? Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1016-1020.
69. Roberts AB, Campbell S. Small biparietal diameter of fetuses with spina
biida: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87(10):
927-928.
70. Wald N, Cuckle H, Boreham J, Stirrat G. Small biparietal diameter of fetuses
with spina biida: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1980;87(3):219-221.
71. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, et al. Fetal hydrocephalus: sonographic
detection and clinical signiicance of associated anomalies. Radiology.
1987;163(1):187-191.
72. Nicolaides KH, Campbell S, Gabbe SG, Guidetti R. Ultrasound
screening for spina biida: cranial and cerebellar signs. Lancet. 1986;
2(8498):72-74.
73. Pilu G, Romero R, Reece EA, et al. Subnormal cerebellum in fetuses with
spina biida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(5):1052-1056.
74. Goldstein RB, Podrasky AE, Filly RA, Callen PW. Efacement of the fetal
cisterna magna in association with myelomeningocele. Radiology. 1989;
172(2):409-413.
75. Benacerraf BR, Stryker J, Frigoletto Jr FD. Abnormal US appearance of the
cerebellum (banana sign): indirect sign of spina biida. Radiology. 1989;
171(1):151-153.
76. Furness ME, Barbary JE, Verco PW. A pointer to spina biida: fetal head
shape in the second trimester. In: Gill RW, Dadd MJ, editors. WFUMB
(World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology). Sidney: Pergamon
Press; 1985. p. 296.
77. Campbell J, Gilbert WM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Ultrasound screening
for spina biida: cranial and cerebellar signs in a high-risk population.
Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(2):247-250.
78. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, Mahony BS. Abnormalities of fetal cranial
contour in sonographic detection of spina biida: evaluation of the “lemon”
sign. Radiology. 1988;167(2):387-392.
79. Penso C, Redline RW, Benacerraf BR. A sonographic sign which predicts
which fetuses with hydrocephalus have an associated neural tube defect.
J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(6):307-311.
80. Sharrard WJ. he mechanism of paralytic deformity in spina biida. Dev
Med Child Neurol. 1962;4:310-313.
81. Lorber J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524
unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13(3):279-303.
82. Nelson Jr MD, Bracchi M, Naidich TP, McLone DG. he natural history
of repaired myelomeningocele. Radiographics. 1988;8(4):695-706.
83. Wong LY, Paulozzi LJ. Survival of infants with spina biida: a population
study, 1979-94. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(4):374-378.
84. Oakeshott P, Hunt GM. Long-term outcome in open spina biida. Br J Gen
Pract. 2003;53(493):632-636.
85. Adzick NS, hom EA, Spong CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal
versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med.
2011;364(11):993-1004.
86. Bliton MJ, Zaner RM. Over the cutting edge: how ethics consultation
illuminates the moral complexity of open-uterine fetal repair of spina biida
and patients’ decision making. J Clin Ethics. 2001;12(4):346-360.
87. Walsh DS, Adzick NS, Sutton LN, Johnson MP. he rationale for in utero
repair of myelomeningocele. Fetal Diagn her. 2001;16(5):312-322.
88. Tulipan N, Bruner JP, Hernanz-Schulman M, et al. Efect of intrauterine
myelomeningocele repair on central nervous system structure and function.
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;31(4):183-188.
89. Fichter MA, Dornseifer U, Henke J, et al. Fetal spina biida repair—current
trends and prospects of intrauterine neurosurgery. Fetal Diagn her.
2008;23(4):271-286.
90. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele
and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA. 1999;282(19):
1819-1825.
91. Holmes NM, Nguyen HT, Harrison MR, et al. Fetal intervention for
myelomeningocele: efect on postnatal bladder function. J Urol. 2001;
166(6):2383-2386.
92. Holzbeierlein J, Pope JI, Adams MC, et al. he urodynamic proile of
myelodysplasia in childhood with spinal closure during gestation. J Urol.
2000;164(4):1336-1339.
93. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, et al. Improvement in hindbrain
herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging
following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA. 1999;282(19):
1826-1831.
94. Steinbok P, Cochrane DD. he nature of congenital posterior cervical or
cervicothoracic midline cutaneous mass lesions. Report of eight cases.
J Neurosurg. 1991;75(2):206-212.
95. Bhargava R, Hammond DI, Benzie RJ, et al. Prenatal demonstration of a
cervical myelocystocele. Prenat Diagn. 1992;12(8):653-659.
96. Steinbok P. Dysraphic lesions of the cervical spinal cord. Neurosurg Clin
N Am. 1995;6(2):367-376.
97. Byrd SE, Harvey C, McLone DG, Darling CF. Imaging of terminal myelocystoceles.
J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88(8):510-516.
98. Choi S, McComb JG. Long-term outcome of terminal myelocystocele patients.
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000;32(2):86-91.
99. Muthukumar N. Terminal and nonterminal myelocystoceles. J Neurosurg.
2007;107(2 Suppl.):87-97.
100. Allen LM, Silverman RK. Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of fetal diastematomyelia:
two cases of type I split cord malformation. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2000;15(1):78-82.
101. Sonigo-Cohen P, Schmit P, Zerah M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(7-8):555-560.
102. Dabra A, Gupta R, Sidhu R, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of diastematomyelia
in utero: a case report and literature review. Australas Radiol. 2001;45(2):
222-224.
103. Raghavendra BN, Epstein FJ, Pinto RS, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of
diastematomyelia. J Ultrasound Med. 1988;7(2):111-113.
104. Anderson NG, Jordan S, MacFarlane MR, Lovell-Smith M. Diastematomyelia:
diagnosis by prenatal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(4):
911-914.
105. Korsvik HE, Keller MS. Sonography of occult dysraphism in neonates and
infants with MR imaging correlation. Radiographics. 1992;12(2):
297-306.
106. Has R, Yuksel A, Buyukkurt S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia:
presentation of eight cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2007;30(6):845-849.
107. Harrison LA, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE. Abnormal spinal curvature in
the fetus. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11(9):473-479.
108. Patten RM, Van Allen M, Mack LA, et al. Limb-body wall complex: in
utero sonographic diagnosis of a complicated fetal malformation. AJR Am
J Roentgenol. 1986;146(5):1019-1024.
109. Van Allen MI, Curry C, Walden CE, et al. Limb-body wall complex: II.
Limb and spine defects. Am J Med Genet. 1987;28(3):549-565.
110. Benacerraf BR, Greene MF, Barss VA. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of
congenital hemivertebra. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5(5):257-259.
111. Zelop CM, Pretorius DH, Benacerraf BR. Fetal hemivertebrae: associated
anomalies, signiicance, and outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(3):
412-416.