29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 44 Cervical Ultrasound and Preterm Birth 1501

TABLE 44.1 Prediction of Spontaneous

Preterm Birth Based on Gestational Age (GA)

at Cervical Length Measurement (<25 mm) a

GA at

Delivery

<20 Weeks 20-24 Weeks 24-28

Weeks

<32 weeks 4.1 (1.6-10.1) 4.19 (2.6-6.7) No data

<34 weeks 6.2 (3.2-12.0) 4.40 (3.5-5.4) 4.0 (3.1-5.2)

<37 weeks 8.7 (3.8-19.9) 25.6 (8.5-76.7) 3.1 (1.1-8.9)

a Data presented as odds ratio ±95th percentile conidence intervals.

Modiied from Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, et al.

Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm

birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.

2003;22(3):305-322. 35

Several studies have attempted to improve the predictive value

of TVS by combining with other factors, including obstetric

history and the concentration of fetal ibronectin in cervicovaginal

secretions, to create a risk assessment formula.

PREDICTION OF SPONTANEOUS

PRETERM BIRTH

Obstetric Factors

Celik et al. 36 presented a model to evaluate the ability of combinations

of maternal demographics (age, race, weight, height, smoking

status, history of cervical surgery, obstetric history) and cervical

length between 20 and 24 weeks’ gestation for prediction of

SPTB in about 59,000 women with singleton pregnancies. he

best prediction for SPTB was provided by cervical length alone,

which was improved by adding obstetric history but not maternal

characteristics. he estimated detection rates for extreme (<28

weeks), early (28-30 weeks), moderate (31-33 weeks), and mild

(34-36 weeks) PTB by combining obstetric history and cervical

length were 80.6%, 58.5%, 53.0%, and 28.6%, respectively, with

a 10% false-positive rate. hese data suggest that the combined

screening model has better predictive value than either factor

alone; similar indings in smaller-scale studies have been

reported. 37

Fetal ibronectin (FFN) is a glycoprotein that binds the

amniochorion to the decidua and is released into cervicovaginal

luid in response to inlammation or separation of amniochorion

from the decidua. Recent studies suggest that the combined use

of cervical length and FFN improves the diagnostic performance

of each test. 38,39 However, it has been shown that positive or

negative FFN is relevant only when the sonographic cervical

length is less than 30 mm. 40 Risk of SPTB remains low in women

with cervical length of 30 mm or more and in those with cervical

length of between 15 and 30 mm and negative FFN. 38,39,41

Cervical Funneling

Much controversy surrounds the utility of measuring the cervical

“funnel,” which is deined as the dilation of the internal os and

the herniation of the fetal membranes into the cervical canal by

more than 5 mm 42 (Figs. 44.11 and 44.12, Video 44.1). To et al. 43

reported that funneling of the internal os was present in 4% of

all pregnancies; the shorter the cervix was, the greater was the

likelihood of funneling, with 98% prevalence if the length was

less than 15 mm and only 1% if greater than 30 mm. he rate

of SPTB was increased in pregnancies demonstrating cervical

funneling. However, funneling did not provide any signiicant

contribution to the prediction of SPTB when combined with

cervical length. 44,45 As an isolated inding compared with cervical

length, the residual closed length measurements have a better

predictive value than funneling. In addition, the shape or size

of the funnel was not correlated to SPTB. As such, funneling is

best reported as a categorical variable (present or absent) and

best interpreted in the context of overall cervical length and

obstetrical history.

Rate of Cervical Change

In their meta-analysis, Honest et al. 35 correlated a single measurement

of cervical length at a single time point in gestation with

the risk of SPTB. However, the events of prematurity occur along

a continuum and likely develop over an as-yet undeined and

variable period. herefore progressive shortening of the cervix

may be more important than a single abnormal cervical length

measurement. A “short and shortening” cervical length may be

a more efective tool for SPTB prediction than a “short but stable”

cervical length. In a cohort of unselected patients, Naim et al. 46

demonstrated that if cervical length decreased on serial scans,

the odds ratio for SPTB increased 6.8-fold per unit of change

(one unit = decline of 10 mm per month). In women at increased

risk of PTB, Owen at el. 28 reported that serial measurements up

to 24 weeks’ gestation signiicantly improved the prediction of

SPTB compared with a single cervical measurement at 16 to 18

weeks. Similarly, in women at increased risk of SPTB (based on

obstetric history), if cervical length remained stable from 12 to

20 weeks and greater than 25 mm, all patients delivered at term. 47

Patients in whom cervical length became serially shorter (ultimately

<15 mm) and the decrease in length occurred before 20

weeks were ofered and accepted a cervical cerclage, and all

delivered ater 30 weeks’ gestation. Groom et al. 48 and Szychowski

et al 49 reported similar results. hese studies suggest three

important points:

1. Serial cervical assessment is important to predict SPTB.

2. Progressive cervical shortening in patients at increased risk

may begin before the typical timing of routine cervical assessment

at the second-trimester fetal anatomic scan, advocating

for initiation of serial cervical assessment early in the second

trimester.

3. Serial cervical shortening in the second trimester may identify

patients with true mechanical failure of the cervix, who may

beneit from the placement of a cerclage to prevent SPTB.

Dynamic Cervical Change

A dynamic cervix is deined as having spontaneous shortening,

lengthening, or funneling observed during real-time TVS 50 (Fig.

44.13). However, the value of a dynamic cervix for the prediction

of SPTB is less clearly deined than that of a short cervix. Owen

et al. 28 demonstrated that dynamic cervical length shortening in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!