29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 22 The Scrotum 851

sonography can assess for viability of the testis in the setting of

penetrating trauma. A careful gray-scale and color low Doppler

evaluation of the epididymis should be performed in all examinations

of blunt trauma. Traumatic epididymitis may be an isolated

inding that should not be confused with an infectious process. 204

CRYPTORCHIDISM

he testes remain near the deep inguinal ring until the seventh

month of gestation when they normally begin their descent

through the inguinal canal into the twin scrotal sacs. 1,2 he

gubernaculum testis is a ibromuscular structure that extends

from the inferior pole of the testis to the scrotum and guides

the testis in its descent, a process normally completed before

birth. Undescended testis is one of the most common genitourinary

anomalies in male infants. At birth, 3.5% of male infants

weighing more than 2500 g have an undescended testis; 10% to

25% of these cases are bilateral. his igure decreases to 0.8% by

age 1 year because the testes descend spontaneously in most

infants. he incidence of undescended testes increases to 30%

in premature infants, approaching 100% in neonates who weigh

less than 1000 g at birth. Complete descent is necessary for full

testicular maturation. 205,206

Malpositioned testes may be located anywhere along the

pathway of descent from the retroperitoneum to the scrotum.

Most (80%) undescended testes are palpable, lying distal to the

external inguinal ring. Anorchia occurs in 4% of the remaining

patients with impalpable testes. 206

Localization of the undescended testis is important for the

prevention of two potential complications of cryptorchidism:

infertility and cancer. he undescended testis is more likely to

undergo malignant change than is the normally descended testis. 3

he most common malignancy is seminoma. he risk of malignancy

is increased in both the undescended testis ater orchiopexy

and the normally descended testis. herefore careful serial

examinations of both testes are essential.

Sonographically, the undescended testis is oten smaller and

slightly less echogenic than the contralateral, normally descended

testis (Fig. 22.36). he pars infravaginalis gubernaculi, which is

the distal bulbous segment of the gubernaculum testis, can be

FIG. 22.36 Testis in Inguinal Canal. Longitudinal scan shows an

elongated, ovoid, undescended testis.

mistaken for the testis. Ater completion of testicular descent,

the pars infravaginalis gubernaculi and the gubernaculum

normally atrophy. If the testis remains undescended, both

structures persist. he pars infravaginalis gubernaculi is located

distal to the undescended testis, usually in the scrotum, but it

may be found in the inguinal canal. Sonographically, the pars

infravaginalis gubernaculi is a hypoechoic, cordlike structure of

echogenicity similar to the testis, with the gubernaculum leading

to it. 207

Sonography is oten used in the initial evaluation of cryptorchidism,

although the value of this has been questioned because

it is insensitive in detecting high intraabdominal testes. 208 MRI

has also been used in cryptorchidism because it is more sensitive

than ultrasound in detecting undescended testes in the retroperitoneum.

209,210 Nonvisualization of an undescended testis on

sonography or MRI does not exclude its presence, and therefore

laparoscopy or surgical exploration should be performed if

clinically indicated.

REFERENCES

1. Larsen WJ. Human embryology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.

p. 235-280.

2. Moore KL, Persaud TVN. he developing human: clinically oriented

embryology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993.

3. Krone KD, Carroll BA. Scrotal ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 1985;23(1):

121-139.

4. Trainer TD. Histology of the normal testis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11(10):

797-809.

5. Siegel MJ. he acute scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35(4):

959-976.

6. homas RD, Dewbury KC. Ultrasound appearances of the rete testis. Clin

Radiol. 1993;47(2):121-124.

7. Johnson KA, Dewbury KC. Ultrasound imaging of the appendix testis and

appendix epididymis. Clin Radiol. 1996;51(5):335-337.

8. Sellars ME, Sidhu PS. Ultrasound appearances of the testicular appendages:

pictorial review. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(1):127-135.

9. Black JA, Patel A. Sonography of the normal extratesticular space. AJR Am

J Roentgenol. 1996;167(2):503-506.

10. Allen TD. Disorders of the male external genitalia. In: Kelalis PP, King LR,

editors. Clinical pediatric urology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1976. p.

636-668.

11. Middleton WD, Bell MW. Analysis of intratesticular arterial anatomy with

emphasis on transmediastinal arteries. Radiology. 1993;189(1):157-160.

12. Fakhry J, Khoury A, Barakat K. he hypoechoic band: a normal inding

on testicular sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(2):321-323.

13. Bushby LH, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS. he “two-tone” testis: spectrum of

ultrasound appearances. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(11):1119-1123.

14. Middleton WD, horne DA, Melson GL. Color Doppler ultrasound of the

normal testis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(2):293-297.

15. Gooding GA. Sonography of the spermatic cord. AJR Am J Roentgenol.

1988;151(4):721-724.

16. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Richie JP. Sonography of the male genital tract.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(4):705-713.

17. Rikin MD, Kurtz AB, Pasto ME, Goldberg BB. Diagnostic capabilities of

high-resolution scrotal ultrasonography: prospective evaluation. J Ultrasound

Med. 1985;4(1):13-19.

18. Rikin MD, Kurtz AB, Pasto ME, et al. he sonographic diagnosis of

focal and difuse iniltrating intrascrotal lesions. Urol Radiol. 1984;6(1):

20-26.

19. Carroll BA, Gross DM. High-frequency scrotal sonography. AJR Am J

Roentgenol. 1983;140(3):511-515.

20. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, O’Donoghue MJ, Green DE. From the archives

of the AFIP: tumors and tumorlike lesions of the testis: radiologic-pathologic

correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):189-216.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!